Search for: "Companies A, B, and C"
Results 8421 - 8440
of 12,883
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2012, 7:57 am
As I have written elsewhere, Wal-Mart is Exhibit A, B and C for an independent chief compliance officer (i.e. not beholden to the General Counsel or any other corporate officer) who can oversee, among other things, the integrity of the investigation and the overall internal reporting system. [read post]
3 May 2012, 2:15 pm
Coombe and William C. [read post]
3 May 2012, 2:15 pm
Coombe and William C. [read post]
3 May 2012, 10:09 am
b. any U.S. savings bonds? [read post]
3 May 2012, 10:03 am
In Nosal, the wrongful act was essentially trade secret misappropriation where the "exceeded authorization" was violation of a clear "don't use our information except for company benefit" type of policy. [read post]
3 May 2012, 8:51 am
The key steps which any company reviewing its "cookies compliance" should follow are:Step 1 – Cookies AuditYou should begin identifying the cookies (and similar technology) which are used by your websites. [read post]
3 May 2012, 8:01 am
Gillies, Special Agent in Charge, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Miami Field Office; Christopher B. [read post]
3 May 2012, 4:30 am
The take away is that it is usually preferable for the acquiror to purchase the assets of the business rather than the stock of the company because of the (a) tax advantages and (b) potential risks and liabilities in connection with purchasing shares of a business.1. [read post]
3 May 2012, 2:01 am
Its main argument was that only EU citizens and companies could register such domain names. [read post]
3 May 2012, 1:41 am
According to plaintiff’s counsel’s May 2, 2012 press release (here), the complaint alleges that during the class period: Allscripts concealed that: (a) the process of developing a unified product offering after the Merger had suffered debilitating setbacks, including major undisclosed schisms among the most senior levels of the Company, which ultimately resulted in the loss of key personnel and harmful upheaval in Company leadership; (b) a… [read post]
2 May 2012, 12:50 pm
Indeed, background checks are done to protect (a) the public from the consequences of the wrong person in the wrong job; (b) employees from the consequences of hiring the wrong person; (c) the company’s assets; and (d) the company’s reputation. [read post]
2 May 2012, 12:26 pm
The author of this blog is Douglas C. [read post]
2 May 2012, 12:26 pm
The author of this blog is Douglas C. [read post]
2 May 2012, 12:26 pm
The author of this blog is Douglas C. [read post]
2 May 2012, 12:26 pm
The author of this blog is Douglas C. [read post]
2 May 2012, 7:35 am
The author of this blog is Douglas C. [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:05 pm
(c) Notwithstanding paragraph (a), a lawyer may make a statement that a reasonable lawyer would believe is required to protect a client from the substantial undue prejudicial effect of recent publicity not initiated by the lawyer or the lawyer’s client. [read post]
1 May 2012, 5:25 pm
Instead, in deciding whether or not there has been an authorisation all 5 judges directed attention to the 3 criteria specified in 101(1A) and 36(1A): (a) the extent (if any) of the person’s power to prevent the doing of the act concerned; (b) the nature of any relationship existing between the person and the person who did the act concerned; (c) whether the person took any other reasonable steps to prevent or avoid the doing of the act, including whether the person complied… [read post]
1 May 2012, 2:16 pm
As James B. [read post]
1 May 2012, 2:16 pm
As James B. [read post]
