Search for: "Cost v. Cost"
Results 8421 - 8440
of 48,941
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2020, 10:13 am
Co. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 9:05 am
The decision of Brown v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 7:56 am
Best v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 7:53 am
Grossman and Gordon V. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 7:52 am
Appellate Court Determines Who is Responsible for Previous Costs A recent case from Cook County, Shannon Court Condominium Association v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 6:15 am
I would highly recommend Kevin Sheerin…” Gabriel V. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
In Stavropoulos and others v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
In this case comment, David Bridge, Kenny Henderson, Jessica Foley, Devina Shah and Imtiyaz Chowdhury who all work within the Dispute Resolution team at CMS, comment on the decision handed down earlier this month by the UK Supreme Court in this matter of Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd v Visa Europe Services LLC and others [2020] UKSC 24: On 17 June 2020, the Supreme Court handed down a significant judgment in the long-running, combined cases of Sainsbury’s… [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
County of Butte v. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 10:33 pm
Ante (citing Craig v. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
In Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 4:42 pm
The court’s decision comes just days before the rule’s June 30 compliance date (XY Planning Network, LLC v. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 9:31 am
(Golden Door Properties, LLC v. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 8:35 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has held in Uber Technologies Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 7:55 am
In Brady v. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 7:11 am
In Cordova v. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 6:30 am
Timothy JostAs Texas v. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
" Citing Matter of Weslowski v Vanderhoef, 98 AD3d 1123, the Appellate Division opined that in the event an agency conditions disclosure of material sought pursuant to FOIL upon the prepayment of costs or refuses to disclose records except upon prepayment of costs, the agency has the burden of articulating a particularized and specific justification' for the imposition of those fees. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 12:00 am
" Citing Matter of Weslowski v Vanderhoef, 98 AD3d 1123, the Appellate Division opined that in the event an agency conditions disclosure of material sought pursuant to FOIL upon the prepayment of costs or refuses to disclose records except upon prepayment of costs, the agency has the burden of articulating a particularized and specific justification' for the imposition of those fees. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 1:57 pm
Von Chase v. [read post]
