Search for: "Doe, Appeal of" Results 8421 - 8440 of 108,038
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2007, 10:16 am
Lobach (Maryland Court of Appeals 03/20/2007) did it. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 12:48 pm by CJLF Staff
Federal Gun-buying Ban Upheld for Medical Marijuana Cardholders:  A federal appeals court ruled Wednesday that a federal ban on the sale of guns to medical marijuana card holders does not violate the Second Amendment. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 3:20 pm by Rethabile Shabalala
Is the behaviour of kudus so clearly established and common knowledge or so easily ascertainable that it does not require evidence to be proved? [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 1:38 pm
This report comes to us from Iowa, the Iowa Court of Appeals to be exact. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 2:11 pm by Eugene Volokh
Brown, decided today by the Colorado Court of Appeals, in an opinion by Judge James Casebolt, joined by Judge David Furman (over a dissent by Judge Lino Lipinsky): When does a statement by an irate and angry respondent parent in a dependency and neglect (D&N) case rise to the level of a "credible threat" that may be punished under section 18-8-615, [Colo. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 9:35 am
A finding that a California physician committed professional misconduct after engaging in sexual relations with a patient does not require the physician to instigate, request or return the sexual favor, the Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District said in an August 31, 2011 ruling in William Joseph Roy, Jr., V. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 12:00 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
But some areas of strip search law are so settled that the Court of Appeals does not have to wait for the Supreme Court to decide that case.The case is Perez v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 7:51 am by Blog  Editorial
The UKSC refused permission, stating that the Government’s appealdoes not raise an arguable point of law of general public importance which ought to be considered by the Supreme Court at this time”. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The Board does not see any such reason.[4] As the appeal proceedings were initiated only after the entry into force of the EPC 2000, A 108 in its revised version is to be applied. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 9:04 am by Gene Quinn
Ultimately, the Federal Circuit determined that the ITC properly determined that a domestic industry does not exist nor is in the process of being established for U.S. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 12:31 pm by Jason Byrne
  Additionally, the Court found that MCCA is subrogated to the insurer’s rights to the deductible, and is entitled to pursue payment of that deductible if the insurer does not. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 3:54 pm by Will Patton
But the PRA does not state that an agency’s violation of independent statutory duties to prepare records is a violation of the PRA. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:19 pm
Diocesan attorney Scott Brister explains that “the Court holds conference and takes votes every Monday in June; thereafter, it does not convene again until August. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 7:43 am by Michael O. Smith
An appeal before the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court addressed the measure of punitive damages to be awarded to a motor vehicle accident victim and his family. [read post]
16 May 2016, 12:17 pm by Liisa Speaker
MCR 7.205(G)(3) states: [L]eave to appeal may not be granted if an application for leave to appeal is filed more than 6 months after the later of:  (a) entry of a final judgment or other order that could have been the subject of an appeal of right, or  (b) entry of the order or judgment to be appealed from....However, upon close examination, the court rule states only that the Court may not grant leave, it does not say that an application may… [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 11:12 am
When one of the exceptions occurs, time is "tolled" (that time does not count toward the 90-day limit). [read post]
8 Jun 2013, 6:56 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Baker:After construing K.S.A. 60-1507 as a whole and in harmony with Supreme Court Rule 183, we hold that under the facts of this case, the 1-year time limitation in which to file a K.S.A. 60-1507 motion does not begin until the time to appeal from the resentencing expires. [read post]