Search for: "English v. English"
Results 8421 - 8440
of 11,204
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2011, 9:35 pm
Rick Nemcik Cruz kindly provided an English-language summary:Thank you very much for keeping me informed. [read post]
25 May 2011, 1:53 pm
This is their plain English synopsis of the holding: “In its decision in Kentucky v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 12:35 pm
SCC 263.The Supreme Court is not bound by the dicta and authority of English cases.Chatturbhuj Vithaldas Jasani v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 12:09 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 4:53 am
People v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
23 May 2011, 9:00 pm
Salem v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V The contracting Parties shall not be bound to delivery up their own citizens or subjects under the stipulations of this treaty. [read post]
22 May 2011, 11:20 pm
Buglife, R (on the application of) v Natural England [2011] EWHC 746 (Admin) – Read judgment All public lawyers know that judicial review must be commenced “promptly and in any event not later than 3 months” after the public act complained of, failing which a claimant is at the mercy of the court as to whether to extend time. [read post]
22 May 2011, 7:00 pm
The Court of Appeal emphasised earlier this week in R v Dobson that “compelling evidence” does not mean that the evidence must be irresistible, or that absolute proof of guilt is required. [read post]
22 May 2011, 12:00 pm
In this case from the Court of Appeal in Bermuda, the Privy Council is to decide (i) whether s.4 Judgments (Reciprocal Enforcement) Act 1958, so far as it deals with foreign judgments obtained (or allegedly obtained) by fraud, should be interpreted consistently with the common law and the (English) statutory provisions for the registration of foreign judgments, as this was determined by the House of Lords in Owens Bank Ltd v Bracco; (ii) whether the Appellant is entitled to apply… [read post]
22 May 2011, 5:49 am
The point has been made in both English and German courts that public announcements by the impugned party in its own words carry less weight than judicial ones (Jameel (Mohammed) v Wall Street Journal Europe Sprl [2007] 1 AC 359 at 376). [read post]
22 May 2011, 4:02 am
Some will see in this a welcome piece of common sense, entirely in accord with the manner in which the English High Court and Court of Appeal had addressed (albeit in mirror image) the same issue in the proceedings which the bank had brought: BVG v Morgan Chase Bank NA [2010] EWCA Civ 390. [read post]
21 May 2011, 8:03 am
In Dallah Real Estate v Pakistan, the arbitration clause read: "23. [read post]
20 May 2011, 10:19 am
(Orin Kerr) The Eleventh Circuit has handed down a new en banc decision, Gilbert v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 2:42 pm
The definition of ‘structure’ in Irvine v Moran was approved in Marlborough Park Services Lyd v Rowe [2006] EWCA Civ 436, but not the point on plaster.Ms Grand argued that Irvine was wrong in principle. [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:15 pm
The court in Deutsch v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:00 pm
Malaysia International Extradition Treaty with the United States August 3, 1995, Date-Signed June 2, 1997, Date-In-Force 104TH CONGRESS 2d Session SENATE LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL THE WHITE HOUSE, May 17, 1996. [read post]
19 May 2011, 8:36 am
The 11th Circuit's en banc decision today in Gilbert v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 7:16 am
The Court found that the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of success on their claim that Section 5.2(a)(v) of the merger agreement was an unreasonable defensive measure. [read post]
