Search for: "FAIR v. THE STATE"
Results 8421 - 8440
of 30,500
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2018, 11:28 am
The United States case. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 7:25 am
After litigating the hell out of the case for a few years, plaintiff's attorneys decided to drop the federal claim brought under the Fair Labor Standards, determining that plaintiffs would get the same relief under the state labor law claims. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 5:33 am
In Israel these days, there’s a fair bit of talk of approaching the conflict on the basis of “two states, one homeland. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 5:07 am
" However, in the one case where the matter has been argued, the result was inconclusive (Francis Day & Hunter Ltd v Bron [1963] Ch. 587.) [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 3:00 am
The issue of bad faith claims in the first party benefits lawsuits was reviewed by the Eastern Federal District Court in the case of Shea v. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 10:15 am
In Silsby v. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 8:40 am
Facts: This case (Atlantic Specialty Insurance, et al v. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 8:02 am
Galardi South Enters. d/b/a The Onyx, and Stevenson v. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 8:02 am
Galardi South Enters. d/b/a The Onyx, and Stevenson v. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 3:26 am
District Judge for the Central District of Illinois, in Hausman v Green, No. 3:18-CV-03013 [July 20, 2018]. [read post]
12 Aug 2018, 9:01 pm
In Republican Party of Minnesota v. [read post]
12 Aug 2018, 8:44 pm
Although the Federal Court granted Turp public interest standing, they dismissed his procedural fairness arguments, referring to League for Human Rights of B’Nai Brith Canada v Odynsky, [95] […] At common law, the Governor in Council is not subject to procedural fairness obligations where it is deciding matters with significant policy content that affect a wide range of constituencies : […]. [read post]
12 Aug 2018, 6:43 am
Supreme Court ruling in Anderson v. [read post]
11 Aug 2018, 6:34 am
Additional Resources: Troester v. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 7:18 am
Layer v. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 7:00 am
” In sum, the record provided “no clarity as to how judicial economy, convenience, fairness, or comity might be served by requiring the parties to expend additional years as well as dollars re-litigating in state court. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 6:05 am
Casey v. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 6:21 pm
No. 17-01005-ess.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 2:42 pm
Part V concludes that the U.S. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 12:36 pm
Basis in the statutory text: effect on the potential market for, or value of, the copyrighted work, stated in the disjunctive. [read post]
