Search for: "Label v Label"
Results 8421 - 8440
of 13,306
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2011, 1:11 pm
Because the same labeling misrepresentations were made to all class members, the misrepresentations were material and a presumption of reliance should have been applied.The August 9 decision is Gaston v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 7:20 am
(Eugene Volokh) The case is Sabol v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
Ringer, 579 F.2d 294, 297 (4th Cir. 1978).See, for example, Adobe Systems v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 10:08 am
See Gaston v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 10:08 am
See Gaston v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 8:26 am
The United States Supreme Court recent decision in PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 11:06 pm
The court ruled on the case Pliva Inc. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 7:55 pm
" The complaint: Scorpio Music v Willis [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:52 am
Gonzales v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:20 am
While the Copyright Act was designed to provide for authors and their families, it is not in the interest of publishers or record labels to educate you about termination rights. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 9:24 pm
Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 6:44 pm
The court, in United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 2:32 pm
Justice Anthony Kennedy’s June 2011 opinion in Bond v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 11:50 am
Supreme Court handle the appeal in Perry v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 6:28 am
A group calling itself Law and Religion Professors has filed an amicus brief in support of the EEOC in the Supreme Court in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 6:01 am
Gaston v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:55 pm
08/15/2011 (WNN) New Orleans, U.S.: The Eastern District Court of Louisiana Doe v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 9:54 pm
” The case cite is Cascade Yarns, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:14 am
The mark HAVANA CLUB appear in other locations on the label, around the neck of the bottle and it is again stated that it is produced in San Juan, Puerto Rico. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:13 am
No reasonable consumer could be misled by those statements and the rest of the label does not put those statements in any doubt. [read post]
