Search for: "Little v. Little"
Results 8421 - 8440
of 39,479
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2007, 5:11 am
After reviewing the relevant law, the Court concluded that the enabling state law, Article 66B, grants considerable discretion to the counties in how they establish land use regulations, ranging from the comprehensive plan being anything from a mere guide to a true regulatory device, notwithstanding Article 66B's phrase "use that conforms to the plan" to describe a "special exception".Turning to the implementation of a comprehensive plan by Allegheny County, the Court found… [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
To the extent finding the reports to be material, companies would have little choice but to disclose massive amounts of unimportant information. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 3:19 pm
In spades.So, for example, check out these quotes, all of which are directed at counsel for the plaintiffs, Stephan Williams and Daniel Bartley:"[Plaintiff's] statement of facts gives the impression that little else occurred at trial other than her direct examination during her case-in-chief. . . . [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 12:26 pm
But only a little. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 10:56 am
Was there a defined benefit in both publicity and sales for Gears as a result of having little competition? [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 6:15 pm
" This little jewel of an argument makes clear what critics of the law have been saying from the beginning: States generally do not have the knowledge of immigration law to make these kinds of subtle policy choices. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 12:01 pm
As a result, my thoughts here were a little more nuanced than the harsh reaction that I usually have to the variety of inexcusable acts that are too-often performed by counsel.Admittedly, even beyond the (horrible) nature of her offenses, there were other facts in here that made Ms. [read post]
14 May 2008, 10:48 am
Which in turn spawned the (predictable) second appeal.Judge McKeown wrote for a unanimous panel that, yep, the district court was correct, and that creating "a little donut hole of land with a cross in the midst of a vast federal preserve" didn't negate the Establishment Clause violation, especially given the (decidedly non-neutral) conditions of the transfer. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 11:58 am
.'s office a little over a year to file its opposition, which also seems a bit long. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 11:22 am
It's a complicated case, and one that requires more than a little thought. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 11:27 am
Further, the use of a small, disrobed, wigless, lifeless female mannequin rendered the exhibition almost derisory, with the spectacle of defendant throttling a nonsentient, plastic entity that bore little physical likeness to the large male victim, all as orchestrated by the prosecutor. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 11:03 am
In part because this is an exceptionally high-profile case, so I'll have very little to add beyond what other people will say. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 11:31 am
Well, absent a little more evidence in the record, we're a bit hesitant to reach the merits at this point, given at least the possibility of mootness. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 10:51 am
Isn't it also a little strange that the three Ninth Circuit judges here are reviewing the (somewhat) ethical propriety of one of their colleagues? [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 1:43 pm
I might have written the opinion a little differently than he did, since for me, I might have wanted to make it very clear that I'd have probably come out the other way if the money didn't go to the prisoner's burial expenses or heirs (or, in an appropriate case, if the prisoner can prove that he has no heirs and his burial expenses are pre-paid, I'd probably give him access to the money). [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 1:15 pm
For the rest of your life.One nonetheless feels a little bad for the guy. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 10:51 am
But today's Ninth Circuit case has a new (and interesting) factual twist on the whole issue.A little background first. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 10:33 am
The quantum level of information necessary for knowledge about a future event seems a little more up for debate, I think, than one might get from reading either opinion in this case.Two other tangential points. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 11:45 am
Important stuff.Second, there was also a line in the opinion that struck me as somewhat interesting, particularly because I've started to use Yelp a little bit myself over the past couple of years. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 10:07 am
You have to be a little, well, "different" when you threaten to kill people in an open and obvious way. [read post]
