Search for: "Mark Harms" Results 8421 - 8440 of 10,422
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2011, 3:11 pm
 Ford is therefore suing for irreparable harm suffered; claiming unspecified damages and injunctive relief (see The Times here). [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 5:38 pm by Joe Consumer
House Judiciary Committee continues its mark up of H.R. 5 on Wednesday, a bill that would massively preempt state medical malpractice laws as bill supporters try to tell states that they do not know best - Congress does. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 5:38 pm by Joe Consumer
House Judiciary Committee continues its mark up of H.R. 5 on Wednesday, a bill that would massively preempt state medical malpractice laws as bill supporters try to tell states that they do not know best - Congress does. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 1:25 pm by Greenberg & Bederman
We mean doctors who gave a rushed and thoroughly disinterested diagnosis that resulted in real harm being done to the patient. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 11:43 am by Ilya Somin
Had Kerensky suppressed the Bolsheviks in 1917 (as he easily could have that summer) or had the Weimar Republic done the same with the Nazis, the world would be a vastly better place, even though most political censorship (even of evil ideologies) causes far more harm than good. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 11:34 am by Christina D. Frangiosa
It also seemed to overlook the trademark owner's enforcement obligations – even for common law marks which have not achieved registration (which can support litigation based on 15 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 6:01 pm by Medical Library
  Analysis from 2001-2005 showed countries in the WHO Americas, European, Eastern Mediterranean and Western Pacific regions had relatively stable consumption levels during that time; but marked increases were seen in Africa and South-East Asia during the five-year period. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 6:46 am by James Bickford
  Feldman produces many historical examples to the contrary and argues that “the justices’ few and meager contacts with the real world do little harm and perhaps occasionally some good. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 3:29 am by Marie Louise
(TTABlog) US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Coach – Gina Kim sues Coach for defamation, misrepresentation of trademark infringement etc over false accusation of counterfeit sales: Gina Kim v Coach (I [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 2:56 pm
Having reported very recently on one ultra-descriptive trade mark (NO ANIMALS WERE HARMED, in "King's Speech Suffers New Impediment", here), the IPKat found himself facing another mark of the same species, which again secured a degree of success in terms of enforcement -- but here the IPKat has more sympathy with the trade mark owner. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 7:28 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Walking Mountain—consequence of not thinking about images as marks rather than bad thinking about images. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 7:07 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Another proposal: make plaintiff prove harm as part of her case. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 2:46 pm
We should all be thankful that none of the children on the bus were seriously harmed. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 12:01 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Dilution is supposed to be directed at an economic harm: the distinctiveness of the mark/its source identification function. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 10:36 am by Kent Scheidegger
The Arizonan, who is now second in the GOP leadership, has made his mark the old fashioned way--by knowing what he is talking about. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 1:13 pm by SOIssues
“But the chances will be decreased if we implement a healthy buffer zone between children, their parents and the people who have proven they harm innocent children,” she said. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 3:03 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  First, the Ninth correctly finds that Chief Justice Roberts' plurality opinion in Baze is the controlling one under the Marks rule. [read post]