Search for: "National Labor Relations Board, The" Results 8421 - 8440 of 8,610
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2008, 5:15 am
  The six elected members to the board? [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 10:01 am
            Section 2(2) of the National Labor Relations Act provides that the term "employer" shall not include "any person subject to the Railway Labor Act. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 3:38 am
Outside Salespersons Any individual who is the parent, spouse, child, or legally adopted child of the employer Any individual participating in a national service program, such as AmeriCorps. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 2:22 pm
The proposed Civil Rights Act of 2008 (discussed in a previous post) contains a provision that would allow the National Labor Relations Board the authority to  award undocumented employees backpay. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 11:43 am
Obama has also co-sponsored legislation to overturn the National Labor Relations Board’s decision to classify nurses as supervisors so they’ll be able to freely organize a union. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 10:50 am
The proposed Civil Rights Act of 2008 (discussed in a previous post) contains a provision that would allow the National Labor Relations Board the authority to  award  undocumented employees backpay. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 11:37 am
This was a blow to United Rentals because it had a collective bargaining agreement with another union (also it didn't want to bargain with the Laborers Union when that agreement expired); and so it filed a charge with the National Labor Relations Board that Indiana Constructors and the Laborers Union were violating the National Labor Relations Act's "hot cargo" provision. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 9:17 am
–Give the National Labor Relations Board authority to award backpay to undocumented employees. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 3:37 pm
  After one is concluded, regardless of who wins, there are always  unfair labor practice charges filed with the National Labor Relations Board. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 6:51 am
NLRB-Conducted Elections Will Be More Patriotic Posted on February 29, 2008 by Franck Wobst The National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) modified its election procedures earlier this month to incorporate the display of an American flag at all Agency-conducted elections. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 5:17 am
Our colleagues at Workplace Horizons are back in business after a temporary hiatus occasioned by their work on the National Labor Relations Board's assertion of jurisdiction over Foxwoods Resort Casino. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 1:10 pm
The National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) modified its election procedures earlier this month to incorporate the display of an American flag at all Agency-conducted elections. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 10:32 am
Nations issued his decision Feb. 21, 2007. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 4:34 am
Of course, unions claim that PLAs are a "good thing" because they result in labor harmony and the payment of area standard wages and benefits.In July, 2007, the National Labor Relations Board (the "NLRB") issued its decision in Glens Falls Building and Construction Trades Council, 350 NLRB No. 42 (2007). [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 4:07 pm
One practically has to have worked in NGOs to understand just what it means to have an organization whose board of directors is not self-appointing and self-perpetuating, from the top down. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 10:52 am
The National Labor Relations Board recently issued a decision severely limiting the rights of employee union advocates to use employer email to conduct solicitations of fellow employees. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 11:29 am
The National Labor Relations Board has announced that the Labor Board's election processes have been modified to incorporate the display of an American flag at all Agency-conducted representational elections. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 4:20 am
Then management is coming in there with a big hired gun [in front of the National Labor Relations Board]. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 11:12 am
In a recent ruling, the NLRB tweaked its views on whether and how employers may restrict the use of workplace email systems. [read post]