Search for: "Ruth"
Results 8421 - 8440
of 9,230
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2018, 12:49 pm
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has filed a dissenting opinion, joined by Sotomayor. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 12:45 pm
He announces that Justice Sonia Sotomayor has the dissent, joined by Breyer and Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Elena Kagan. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 9:57 am
ShareThe Supreme Court on Monday will revisit a long-simmering tension between legal protections for LGBTQ people and the rights of business owners who oppose same-sex marriage. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 5:36 am
From the write-up of Jeff Jeffrey -- yes, that's his real name, we got to meet him at the conference -- for the BLT: Alito said that, although he disagreed with Sotomayor's Second Circuit vote and Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's Supreme Court dissent, they and other colleagues with whom he has disagreed during his time as a judge were not "fools or acting in bad faith" [a reference back to a quotation he mentioned earlier]. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 12:02 pm
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg dissented on that facet of the ruling, joined by Justices Stephen G. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 8:07 am
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg noted that while clerks “save us hours upon hours of labor[,] . . . most of them are also young and in need of the seasoning that experiences in life and in law practice afford. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 10:30 am
Justice Kennedy, joined by Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen G. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 12:46 pm
He announces that Justice Elena Kagan has the dissent, joined by Justices Ruth Bader Ginsbur [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 1:25 pm
The petitioners argued that the “person,” for all intents and purposes, ultimately must always be eligible voters, a proposition the Justices rejected unanimously with Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg writing for the Court. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 4:07 pm
Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Elena Kagan, and Sonia Sotomayor. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:25 am
Both Kennedy’s concurrence (joined by Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan) and Justice Clarence Thomas’ concurrence answered the former question directly and unequivocally. [read post]
Symposium: “Schrödinger’s tax” is dead – and the command to buy health insurance is unconstitutional
9 Nov 2020, 6:28 am
In Parts II and III-C, Roberts wrote the opinion of the court with the support of the four liberals, including the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, to address the nature of the shared responsibility payment: either regulatory penalty or tax. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 9:08 pm
Breyer and Ruth Bader Ginsburg. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
(In this regard, Barrett is a worthy successor to Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, another civil procedure professor who viewed International Shoe as dispositive in this area.)What now? [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 11:53 am
Only three justices remain from the Flores-Ortega court – Justices Clarence Thomas, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 8:16 am
” Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, writing for the four Justices in the Hobby Lobby dissent, concluded that “the Government has shown that the contraceptive coverage for which the ACA provides furthers compelling interests in public health and women’s well-being. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 6:47 am
Not only that, when Clinton announced the nomination of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, he used both of the words that, according to Gerhardt's theory, indicate an unconstitutional preference for religion: People will find, as I have, that this nominee is a person of immense character. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 8:34 am
Breyer wrote for the dissenters, including Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Elena Kagan, and Sonia Sotomayor. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 1:47 pm
” Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg entered the fray, asking Francisco (somewhat rhetorically) whether the federal government had previously agreed that a failure to vote “was not a reliable indicator” that someone had actually moved. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 11:59 am
When Francisco returns to the lectern, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg asks him about Dreeben’s concern, that if they read the statute as Francisco is urging, “Then every government official can say, ‘You want to have a meeting? [read post]
