Search for: "State v. Bui"
Results 8421 - 8440
of 9,825
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2015, 6:22 pm
I to V – 1st offense. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 9:32 am
And that just covers the United States. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 11:29 pm
V. [read post]
13 May 2011, 11:17 pm
” And thank you for stating the obvious. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 8:08 am
Consider Business Valuation Methods The method used to value your business can have significant tax implications: Asset-based valuation: May result in higher immediate taxes if you buy out your spouse’s share Income-based approach: Might lead to ongoing payments taxed as ordinary income Discounts for lack of marketability or control: Can reduce the taxable value of business interests (see Estate of Davis v. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 8:08 am
Consider Business Valuation Methods The method used to value your business can have significant tax implications: Asset-based valuation: May result in higher immediate taxes if you buy out your spouse’s share Income-based approach: Might lead to ongoing payments taxed as ordinary income Discounts for lack of marketability or control: Can reduce the taxable value of business interests (see Estate of Davis v. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 8:08 am
Consider Business Valuation Methods The method used to value your business can have significant tax implications: Asset-based valuation: May result in higher immediate taxes if you buy out your spouse’s share Income-based approach: Might lead to ongoing payments taxed as ordinary income Discounts for lack of marketability or control: Can reduce the taxable value of business interests (see Estate of Davis v. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 6:50 am
How sloppy can the state mandate be before its speech-suppression consequences are so clear that courts should step in and, like the court in CDT v. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 6:49 am
How sloppy can the state mandate be before its speech-suppression consequences are so clear that courts should step in and, like the court in CDT v. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 4:00 am
Articles cited herein without stated authors are those of the author of this article—Ken Chasse.) [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 9:26 am
In BTR Enterprises of SC, LLC v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 6:11 am
McCutcheon v. the Federal Election Commission seeks to eliminate the ceiling on what wealthy individuals can donate to federal candidates, parties, and PACs in a two-year election cycle. [read post]
21 May 2010, 1:11 pm
I'm an opponent of the administrative state. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 10:03 pm
(Indeed, you are required by law to get it—or perhaps not exactly required, see NFIB v. [read post]
30 Sep 2012, 8:51 pm
Ringgold v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am
Michael Mabry stated the following in his declaration: “We havenever been contacted by Aurora nor [sic] any of its agents in person, by telephone or byfirst class mail to explore options for us to avoid foreclosure as required in CC § 2923.5. [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 11:05 am
interview: (IP tango) Events 7 July: PLI briefing webcast ‘Life after Quanta v LGE: What every patent lawyer needs to know’: (PLI), 7-15 July/16-18 July: 2nd Transatlantic IP summer academy, modules one and two – Alicante/Milan: (IPKat), 9 July 2008: ALI & ABA webcast ‘Quanta v LG: What you should know’: (Patent Docs), 11 July: CIPA moot to improve participants’ understanding of procedures of EPO Technical… [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 12:18 pm
Copyright: Baker v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 10:07 am
[RT: Lipton’s point v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Court reconsidering baseless ‘making available’ theory in file-sharing case Capitol Records v Jammie Thomas; amicus briefs from, MPAA, PFF: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Electronic Fontier Foundation), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Patry Copyright Blog) ICANN approves rules allowing brands to be… [read post]
