Search for: "State v. Congress" Results 8421 - 8440 of 29,292
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2019, 9:27 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Split process into looking at unopposed v. new proposals/data. [read post]
14 May 2019, 9:27 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Specifically, the origin of the creative work contained in that copy is not the same thing as the origin of the physical copy, no matter whether the copy is on a general-purpose computer, a videotape, or a DVD, and thus failure to attribute the origin of the creative content is not actionable under §43(a)(1)(A) per Dastar.]It also stated that Congress might want to consider amending the Lanham Act to create new causes of action to cover false representations regarding… [read post]
14 May 2019, 4:47 am by Andrew Kent
And third, as Daniel Hemel and Eric Posner have pointed out, the Supreme Court did not apply a clear statement in United States v. [read post]
12 May 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
” Critics assert, in particular, that the president seems oblivious to a 1993 Supreme Court ruling, Nixon v. [read post]
12 May 2019, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
Google Canada 2019 FC 559 https://t.co/o8223JEUyT 2019-05-08 Protective order also issued in dTechs EPM Ltd. v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 8:45 am
  As President Trump doubles down on dangerous and inflammatory lies about abortion, when abortion access is under attack all over the country, with politicians in state legislatures passing new restrictions designed to make abortion impossible to access or to challenge Roe v. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:38 pm by Richard Kopenhefer and Michelle Juen
N.L.R.B., 394 U.S. 423, 430 (1969). [12] https://deadline.com/2019/05/writers-agents-fight-wga-questions-david-goodman-dissent-1202606278/. [13] N.L.R.B. v. [read post]
9 May 2019, 8:44 am by Peter Margulies
Under current judicial rulings regarding the federal court settlement in the Flores v. [read post]