Search for: "State v. E. E. B."
Results 8421 - 8440
of 10,077
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2011, 4:19 pm
Ford's attorney e-mailed Dumont's attorney, asking that Dumont reaffirm the debt. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 8:09 am
§ 1988(b) (allowing recovery of attorney fees by a prevailing party in civil rights lawsuits). [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 9:02 am
Supreme Court heard arguments on Wednesday in the case of Samantar v. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 12:23 am
Criminal Sanction Impact.01/29/07 REFERRED TO FINANCELAW / CORRECTNSS2013
MONTGOMERY -- Restricts confinement of persons separate from others in a correctional facilitySUMM : Amd SS137 & 500-k, Cor L Restricts confinement of persons separate from others in a correctional facility within a special housing unit. 01/30/07 REFERRED TO CRIME VICTIMS, CRIME AND CORRECTIONLAW / CORRECTNSS2015
MONTGOMERY -- Requires free distribution of condoms to inmatesSUMM : Add S609, Cor L Requires free,… [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 4:58 am
This is completely optional, but it is important to state clearly whether or not you will be using this approach. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 1:48 pm
Depos v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 8:07 am
L. 107-16, title V, Sec. 532(c)(15), (d), title IX, Sec. 901, June 7, 2001, 115 Stat. 75, 150, temporarily struck out item 2604 “Credit for certain State taxes”. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 10:37 am
In fact, the language in Prop 64 specifically provides that Prop 64’s amendments shall not [B]e construed or interpreted to amend, repeal, affect, restrict, or preempt: . . . [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 11:52 am
” Hill v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 10:02 am
And indeed the logic of United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 9:50 am
“[V]ery serious violent offences” can outweigh an Art 8 claim “even if they were committed by a minor”. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 6:00 pm
(Ars Technica) Battle between software patents and open source (IP Watchdog) US Patents – Decisions District Court E D Texas: Jury finds in favour of Limelight on ongoing battle with Level 3 Communication over patents covering internet content delivery network technology (Law360) USPTO overturns patent for virtual subdomains filed by Ideaflood (Ars Technica) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Bilski - Bilski petitions the Supreme Court to… [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 10:18 am
[3] United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 4:31 pm
§ 3730(b)(5). [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 9:41 am
Nov. 1, 2004) (citing Wolfe v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
Trump and other defendants as soon as reasonably possible[2-b]. [2-a] This is consistent with and reflected in the book. [2-b] This is not consistent with or reflected in the book. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 11:01 am
United States, 174 U. [read post]
12 May 2011, 8:48 am
Martha Elizabeth, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 1:05 pm
People of the State of California v. [read post]
