Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 8421 - 8440
of 9,094
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
Part V identifies key unresolved issues in the state courts. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 1:23 am
In City of Stockton v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 12:25 am
M.S. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 4:46 pm
If the court rules for recusal, the Texas Supreme Court could be put out of business, as could the state’s appeals courts and many district judges. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 10:05 am
State v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 10:27 am
Alberstone v. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 3:03 am
After asecond death warrant was signed, a federal habeas petition was filed, and thefederal district court stayed the execution. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 2:53 pm
" He briefly discusses Romer v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 3:37 pm
“The sense of the Court is that the public’s interest in access must prevail in this instance and that restricting access to all plea agreements is overly broad,” states Moreno’s order. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 9:10 am
U.S. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:23 am
See Abdullahi v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
District No. 1-PCD, 56 F.3d 1514, 1522 (D.C. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 3:48 am
In the first, the court held that McCoy’s various drug-related charges didn’t merge, but after State v. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 5:01 am
Sec. 1407(a); Lexecon, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 1:05 am
First Unum Life Insurance Co.U.S. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 4:42 pm
The judgment of the First District Court of Appeals is reversed. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 11:56 am
In disagreeing with the trial court, the Court of Appeal, First Appellate District held that SB 610 does not mandate that a WSA cover all existing users or a specific methodology for determining sufficiency. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
(IP Dragon) Copycats in China: trains, planes and ... automobiles (IP Dragon) Denmark Copenhagen Maritime and Commercial Court rules Innocent Pictures ApS’ use of ‘Tivoli’ and ‘Tivoli Night’ in context of pornographic broadcasts infringes trade mark rights of Danish amusement park TIVOLI A/S (Class 46) Court finds minimal confusion in MINIMAL case (International Law Office) Europe ECJ: Promotional items do not… [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
Specifically as to inadequate warning claims the court in Anderson v. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 5:23 pm
The district court was free to determine the determinative second question first. [read post]
