Search for: "State v. Light"
Results 8421 - 8440
of 28,970
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2014, 3:42 pm
So states the Georgia Court of Appeals McLaurin v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 4:04 am
Last week, in State v. [read post]
16 May 2022, 12:27 pm
From Schrader v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
Rees, Glossip v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 11:51 am
Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division (DOL) June 27, 2014 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), which would amend the definition of spouse under the current Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA) regulations in light of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 12:13 pm
§ 2254(d)(2), a federal court may grant relief if the state decision "was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the State court proceeding"; and under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
7 May 2019, 5:22 am
” Paco v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 pm
., Local 100, AFSCME, AFL-CIO v City of Mount Vernon 2022 NY Slip Op 04023 Decided on June 22, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 9:41 am
Conroy v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 5:32 am
(Hill v Church of Scientology of Toronto, 1995 CanLII 59 (SCC), [1995] 2 SCR 1130, at para 196)[40] In the present proceeding, the Court is of the opinion that, in light of the facts of the case, the damages alleged by Ms. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 5:49 am
Further case law has also illustrated that the attractiveness of a design, the intentions of the author, the design’s visual effect, symbolism and commercial success in the marketplace will not be factors in a finding of eligibility for copyright protection (Bleistein v Donaldson Lithographing Co).In relation to derivative works, it is stated that the registration of such works would not cover any previously published or registered works (17 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 8:08 am
Those three non-standard-essential patents, which have not previously been asserted against any party, are now at the heart of Ericsson's third ITC complaint against Apple.In light of this newly discovered document, I have to update my hierarchical directory of the seven Ericsson-Apple cases pending in the United States:FRAND actionsEricsson v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 pm
., Local 100, AFSCME, AFL-CIO v City of Mount Vernon 2022 NY Slip Op 04023 Decided on June 22, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 12:09 pm
Central States S.E. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 11:45 pm
Broom v Secretary of State for Justice [2010] EWHC 2695 (Admin) – Read Judgment When he was transferred from Whitemoor prison to Wakefield Prison in May 2008, Mr. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 7:22 am
And the district court's brief analysis denying Gladding's motion sheds light as to whom the district court thought should bear the burden of proof. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 6:37 pm
Twombly and Ashcroft v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 6:37 pm
Twombly and Ashcroft v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 6:30 am
In Correa v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 9:52 pm
Jang at 3-4.Court's Request for Briefing on Jurisdictional IssueThis petition for permission to file an interlocutory appeal followed, and we directed the parties to address the jurisdictional question [in light of Gunn v. [read post]
