Search for: "State v. Record"
Results 8421 - 8440
of 43,409
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2013, 8:06 am
United States v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 1:38 pm
The European Court of Justice is due to hand down its long awaited judgment in Google v Spain (Case No C-131/12) at 9.30am on 13 May 2014 In this post, Professor Lorna Woods sets out the background to the decision. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:05 pm
State v. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 4:24 pm
In Voss v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 11:38 am
The court reasoned: “Nothing in the record suggests that the public interest will be seriously harmed by the enforcement of this agreement as opposed to a rehashing of the bidding and award process. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 11:15 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Linda Patton v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 5:51 am
” In fact, while four district court judges and the FISA Court have found backdoor searches to be constitutionally reasonable, four circuit court judges — including a unanimous Second Circuit panel in United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:35 pm
Just referencing what is provided in discovery is insufficient under State of Tennessee v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 6:30 am
Though later disparaged in the era of Erie Railroad Co. v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 4:52 am
The case is Sorrell v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 1:30 am
Green v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 1:30 am
Phillips v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:47 am
Judicial Watch, the organization that investigates and fights government corruption, announced today that it has obtained mission expense records and passenger manifests from the United States Air Force related to the June 21-27, 2011, trip taken by First Lady Michelle Obama, her family and her staff to South Africa and Botswana. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 6:33 am
Apollo, 128 N.J. 250 (1992) and Pruder v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 7:47 am
Employee’s ADA claim for damages survives promotion to a higher grade position Matter of Jochelman v New York State Banking Dept., 56 AD3d 375 After the New York State Banking Department denied Irving Jochelman a promotion to the position of Principal Bank Examiner I, Jochelman sued Supreme Court granted Banking’s motion to dismiss his petition because Jochelman had been given the promotion underlying his complaint prior to his appeal, which also had the… [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
Obergefell v. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 7:35 am
In United States v. [read post]
31 May 2008, 7:37 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 2:03 pm
In contrast to CAAF's opinion in Forney, United States v. [read post]
