Search for: "State v. Save" Results 8421 - 8440 of 11,766
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2011, 11:13 pm by Marie Louise
Fremantlemedia North America (Docket Report) When the reverse triangular merger comes to save the beta male – Chancery Court Delaware decision in Meso Scale Diagnostics, LLC. v Roche Diagnostics GMBH (IPKat)   US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Crocs – ITC terminates investigation and issues general exclusion and cease and desist orders in Certain Foam Footwear (337-TA-567) (ITC Law Blog) Heathcote Holdings – False marking action stayed pending… [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 11:34 am by Jeff Gamso
S. 463 (1993), relevant mitigating evidence to be disregarded, see, e. g., Johnson v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 2:11 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) That’s what the Ohio Court of Appeals (State v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 8:21 am by Josh Sturtevant
Civil libertarians are obviously concerned not only that this is being done, but that the data is, according to the plan, going to be saved indefinitely. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 2:15 am
In his recent article, "Effects of Mergers on Non-Assignable Agreements', which appeared in 14 July issue of the New York Law Journal, Glazer discusses the recent decision given by the Delaware Chancery Court in the case of Meso Scale Diagnostics, LLC. v Roche Diagnostics GMBH, here. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 7:32 pm by My name
  As the financial crisis broke, 18 large investment banks received $208 billion in TARP money to save them from insolvency after they made risky bets on CDO’s. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 5:38 am by Steven M. Gursten
Because it is apparently more important that we get our pyrotechnics and fireworks - made in China, of course - then it is to save lives and protect the public. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 1:00 pm by webmaster
Though not expressly stated in the Order, it seems likely that Judge Rakoff was deferring the issuance of a fully-reasoned order until the Supreme Court’s issuance of its Dukes v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 10:36 am by ihwiner
  Although state courts are slightly more efficient than federal courts in California due to the state courts’ own “fast track” rules (which yield intervals to trial of roughly twelve to eighteen months), wise disputants and their lawyers should always consider pre-litigation dispute resolution and ADR options before initiating a lawsuit. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 10:36 am by ihwiner
  Although state courts are slightly more efficient than federal courts in California due to the state courts’ own “fast track” rules (which yield intervals to trial of roughly twelve to eighteen months), wise disputants and their lawyers should always consider pre-litigation dispute resolution and ADR options before initiating a lawsuit. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 1:33 am
Her efforts to meet this burden by contending that the Town failed to prove any cost savings resulted from its reorganization of the building department and elimination of her full-time position was rejected by the court. [read post]