Search for: "True the Vote" Results 8421 - 8440 of 11,925
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2011, 7:25 pm by Mark Bennett
Kashmir Hill writes: Republican Dan Patrick, who was the sponsor of the bill in the Senate, withdrew it when he realized he would not have the votes he needed to pass it. [read post]
25 May 2011, 1:47 pm by admin
This is especially true when catastrophic losses occur, such as the losses faced in Florida at this time. [read post]
25 May 2011, 10:53 am by Michelle Lindo McCluer
var _gaq = _gaq || []; _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-22300906-1']); _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']); (function() { var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true; ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? [read post]
25 May 2011, 9:55 am by Nicole Kief, ACLU
  Proponents say that voter fraud is rampant, but it’s just not true. [read post]
25 May 2011, 9:05 am by Susan I. Nelson
Democratic senators stayed true to their word to block the bill — an item designated by Gov. [read post]
25 May 2011, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
That’s true for a simple tax that is computed simply by multiplying a rate by a standard measure. [read post]
25 May 2011, 3:13 am by SHG
The whole point of a jury, of twelve angry men if that's what it turns out to be, is that each individual juror is entitled, actually required, to vote against conviction if he believes, for whatever reasons, that the evidence is insufficient. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:34 am by Aaron Pelley
Allen’s arguments that the prosecutor improperly vouched for the credibility of the victim, and that the information and to convict instruction were deficient for not containing true threat as an element of felony harassment. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:16 am
Extravagant, reckless statements and even claims which may not be true seem to me an inevitable and perhaps essential part of the process by which the voting public informs itself of the qualities of a man who would be President. [read post]
24 May 2011, 3:03 am by Sean Wajert
The committee voted 12-6 to pass S. 623, the so-called Sunshine in Litigation Act. [read post]
24 May 2011, 2:33 am by Mandelman
 If someone took out an adjustable rate loan assuming they could refinance in the future if rates started going up, that was not an unreasonable assumption because it has always been true in tis country. [read post]
23 May 2011, 6:09 pm by V.Venkatesan
It simply cannot be assumed that the disqualified MLAs would have voted against him if they had been allowed to participate in the floor test conducted in October, 2010, because the Bommai decision bars any such assumptions from being made. [read post]
21 May 2011, 4:53 am by Jeremy Saland
" Although not charged, if the allegations are true it is likely that the Grand Jury could have easily voted a true bill (indictment) against these defendants for Falsifying Business Records in the First Degree. [read post]
Whatever else may be true, this is not what the founders intended, and not what the nation has practiced. [read post]
20 May 2011, 11:00 am by Lawrence Solum
It’s true that many politicians profess allegiance to legal formalism. [read post]
20 May 2011, 7:08 am by admin
I always voted at my party’s call, And I never thought of thinking for myself at all. [read post]
20 May 2011, 5:14 am by SHG
Because they don’t register to vote, obviously. [read post]