Search for: "United States v. Good"
Results 8421 - 8440
of 21,077
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2011, 8:25 pm
Title: Siefert v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 2:37 pm
It sought judicial permission to obtain, by means of pen registers and trap and trace devices, vast swaths of internet metadata within the United States. [read post]
20 May 2010, 3:43 pm
See United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 3:25 pm
In Schrems v. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court heard argument in Warger v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
Religion has won a number of victories recently at the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 6:39 pm
(People v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 12:03 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2024, 2:26 pm
Finally, relying on the Supreme Court’s recent analysis in United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 4:04 am
At the very least, any legislative effort is premature, pending a study to measure the possible effects of the Iqbal and Twombly decisions that is being conducted by the Judicial Conference of the United States. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 3:02 am
In Taylor v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 1:53 pm
In 2003, Lockheed discovered contamination at the Airdock and entered into a consent agreement with the United States EPA to clean up the contamination. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 3:25 pm
The issues on appeal are whether (1) the district court erroneously precluded his good faith defense, (2) the second count was multiplicitous, and (3) the district court incorrectly applied the United States Sentencing Guidelines ("Guidelines"). [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 5:08 am
The second is perhaps more difficult for some people to swallow: "Because the United States is a distinct sovereign, a defendant may in principle be subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of the United States but not of any particular State. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 5:00 am
To the extent the EU is worried about the U.S. using the Cloud Act to engage in economic espionage, however, there is good reason to believe the existing laws in the United States would prevent the abuse of any economic information. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 9:15 am
But “[t]he Senators and Representatives . . . , and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support [the] Constitution. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 5:00 am
* * * Back in March of this year, the United States Supreme Court in Staub v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 1:32 pm
” The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit addressed this question in Gove v. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 1:56 am
He says that is not something on which there is a margin of appreciation to the state. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
The floor goes to Neil.* Sofa, so good? [read post]
