Search for: "United States v. Justice"
Results 8421 - 8440
of 32,498
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2022, 8:53 am
United States, a case pertaining to sentencing requirements and reductions for drug offenses under the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 and the First Step Act. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 9:54 pm
The United States Supreme Court is expected to hear the case of Wyeth v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 6:57 am
O'Brien (08-1569) - Petitioner's brief Friday, Nov. 27: United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 5:58 am
The case, by the way, was Bogle v. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 11:22 am
Much has been said about the wide range of experiences that Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson will bring to her new job on the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 7:57 pm
United Airlines, 550 So.2d 134, 135 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); General Elec. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 1:52 pm
The standard for confusion is rather low, as eloquently explained by Justice Foster in Morningstar Corp Society v Express Newspaper [1979] FSR. 113: “if a moron in a hurry would be misled. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 2:39 pm
” Foman v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 2:56 am
Commentary on United States v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:06 am
The rulings are: In United States v. [read post]
8 May 2021, 2:55 pm
United States, about reductions of prison sentences for certain crack cocaine offenses. [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 5:08 am
Today, more than 5,000 companies, European as well as American, rely on Privacy Shield as the legal basis for their data exports to the United States. [read post]
21 May 2018, 8:33 am
The United States Supreme Court has finally decided whether a collective action ban included in an employer’s arbitration agreement is lawful under the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”). [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 12:57 pm
Under Solem v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 7:06 am
United States, Torey McKay was charged with possession and distribution of both cocaine and crack. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 12:20 pm
United States and can be accessed here. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 11:07 am
Justice Scalia said it best dissenting in Morrison v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 6:54 am
In Barton, the Supreme Court is examining once again the stop-time rule – the same provision of the Immigration and Nationality Act that the justices dissected in Pereira v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 9:13 pm
In her concurrence, Justice Ginsburg cited to the proposition that “lawfully made under this title” must mean “lawfully made in the United States,” as it is found in §109 of the Act. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:32 am
Finally, the Court invited the Solicitor General to file briefs expressing the views of the United States in two cases, Tarrant Regional Water District v. [read post]
