Search for: "United States v. Place" Results 8421 - 8440 of 24,128
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2016, 5:19 am
 Adopting the doctrine places us with the majority of jurisdictions that have considered the matter.Watts, 2016 WL 237777, at *3 (numerous citations, and the text of Restatement §6(c) omitted).Watts cited repeatedly to another unanimous state supreme court decision in Centocor v. [read post]
The overbreadth doctrine is “strong medicine,” and has a tendency, as Justice Antonin Scalia noted in United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 8:12 am by Mack Sperling
" Judge Jolly concluded his Order by directing counsel to agree on the "time, place, date and mechanics" of an in-person  deposition to take place "in any one of the States of the United States, other than Hawaii and Alaska. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 7:27 am
Rev. 755–802 (1993); Larry Catá Backer, Tweaking Facts, Speaking Judgment: Judicial Transmogrification of Case Narrative as Jurisprudence in the United States and Britain, 6 S. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 1:58 pm by Rick
(I have taken the quote directly from Berger v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 4:04 pm
With this, let’s all move forward together, appreciative of diversity and united as students at Youngstown State University. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 8:56 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals today sided with the United States in the Ancient Coin Collectors Guild (ACCG) Baltimore test case. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 12:55 am by INFORRM
Comparative human rights law Baldassi & Others in 2020 reaches the same conclusion as the Supreme Court of the United States in National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 5:31 am by Melissa Stewart
Though it is not a state party to UNCLOS, the United States submitted a written statement “in its capacity as a Member State of the United Nations” in the only advisory opinion decided by the full tribunal to date. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 1:37 pm
  On August 27, 1994, the Lipsons signed a letter addressed to their solicitor stating that the Bank of Montreal was lending them $562,500 on September 1, 1994 to place a mortgage on the new property. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 6:16 am by Adam Wagner
Quila & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1482 – Read judgment A key part of the government’s strategy to combat forced marriages, preventing people under the age of 21 from entering the country to marry, has been heavily criticised by the Court of Appeal. [read post]