Search for: "Child v. Child" Results 8441 - 8460 of 31,297
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2016, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Regardless of the method of disestablishment, the UPA provides that DNA is the only evidence admissible on the question or paternity and, to be admissible, it must be obtained pursuant to court order or with the consent of all parties.Sheetz v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 3:16 am by sally
Regina (G) v Lambeth London Borough Council and another [2011] EWCA Civ 526; [2011] WLR (D) 152“Accommodation ostensibly provided to a child aged 16 to 17 by a council as a local housing authority was to be deemed to be accommodation provided by it as a children’s services authority where the child met the criteria of a ‘child in need’ within section 17(10) of the Children Act 1989 and the actions of a social worker working for the council… [read post]
16 May 2016, 12:11 pm by Kate Mataya
Importantly, intended parents can be same-sex parents following Obergefell v. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 8:58 am by Stephen Gustitis
If you read Article V of the Texas Rules of Evidence (concerning privileges) you'll find several rules about the admissibility of statements made to certain persons. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 4:37 pm by Eugene Volokh
She said the decision is best for the child, especially while growing up in a county with a large Christian population. [read post]
5 Mar 2022, 5:51 pm by Howard Friedman
As reported in an ACLU press release, earlier this week a Texas state trial court in Jane Doe v. [read post]