Search for: "High v State"
Results 8441 - 8460
of 35,521
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
” This is a high standard. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 11:39 pm
[All of our coverage of the Oatmeal v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 2:31 pm
Fearnow v. [read post]
20 Apr 2019, 4:08 pm
The High Court, the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court are on “vacation” over this period and Inforrm is taking a short Easter break. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 6:12 am
Supreme Court's analysis in State Farm v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 10:32 am
The Oregon Supreme Court unanimously held this in yesterday’s State v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 3:25 pm
In its 1995 decision in United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 1:08 pm
Myers v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 7:06 pm
The law, which is still in effect, mandates that Texas high school seniors in the top ten percent of their class be automatically admitted to any Texas state university. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 6:07 am
Moreover, in Pioneer Aggregates (UK) Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment [1985] AC 132 the House of Lords held that there is no room for any principle of abandonment in planning law. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 5:58 am
The last time the high-court considered the merits of a Second Amendment right to bear arms case was back in 2010.SCOTUS set the current table relative to the right to bear arms in its 2008 District of Columbia v Heller decision. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 11:37 am
We are high school teachers at a charter school in Raleigh, NC. [read post]
23 Oct 2022, 7:35 am
See Ermini v. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 7:47 am
In Quill v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 2:03 pm
The court held that a person who could not live without assistance but whose income was too high for him to be deemed “categorically needy,” could not be offered services only in a nursing home, which was all that the state allowed for individuals deemed “medically needy. [read post]
27 Aug 2024, 8:12 am
Ciraolo and Florida v. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 3:15 pm
Gainesville Women Care, LLC v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 3:13 am
In the High Court, Hamblen J had dismissed the claim finding that the appellant could not be held liable. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 2:53 am
The High Court had felt bound by Court of Appeal jurisprudence to hold that English law was applicable, but granted a leapfrog appeal certificate to the Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 12:54 pm
www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/08pdf/07-751.pdf Waddington v. [read post]
