Search for: "People v Word" Results 8441 - 8460 of 17,918
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2015, 3:00 am by Daphne Keller
  From the perspective of the people seeking information online, the process is entirely opaque. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 10:03 am by David Post
I’m hopeful that this latest decision — the second time (see Sullivan v Government of USA [2012] EWHC 1680 (Admin)) that a U.K. court has found that U.S. civil commitment procedures violate basic human rights — though from a foreign court interpreting foreign law, will add to the weight and persuasiveness of the constitutional challenges to these schemes. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 1:07 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  From the First Amendment side, we have Reed v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 10:30 am by David Kopel
” In other words, the only gun bans that would trigger strict scrutiny would be a ban on all handguns or all shotguns or all rifles. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 7:00 am by GSU Law Student
Sources [1] Bikram’s Yoga Coll. of India, L.P. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 6:38 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In other words, under more recent Supreme Court precedent, Garcia may no longer be good law.The intervening Supreme Court precedent on sovereign immunity and the ADA is United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 1:42 am by Jani Ihalainen
The project came under fire some time ago, prevailing initially, but the case since moved on to the US Court of Appeals, which handed down its judgment only last week.To give this story some color, the case of Authors Guild v Google Inc dealt with the aforementioned project, where snippets of books (in image form or not) are presented to a user who searches the database for a word, phrase or sentence, with the results containing one or more instances of the search terms used in… [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 8:18 am by Eugene Volokh
The Supreme Court has held that observing and photographing people’s homes and surrounding areas from an airplane, flying at 1,000 feet, doesn’t violate the Fourth Amendment (see California v. [read post]