Search for: "People v. Long" Results 8441 - 8460 of 19,209
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Article 15 of the ECommerce Directive lays down the basic principle that EU Member States cannot impose a general obligation on internet intermediaries to monitor what people say online. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 6:46 pm by Bill Otis
 But the question whether the federal Controlled Substances Act is within Congress's power has been raised and settled long ago. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 8:21 am
" Ted Shaw *"It had been a long road... for civil rights litigation. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 3:05 am by Walter Olson
” [Matt Welch] “Threats of violence discourage people from participating in civic life. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 3:45 pm by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
The case, People v Hendrickson, stands for the evidentiary proposition that the testimony of the un-married participant in an adulterous union (the "other woman") can supply the requisite testimony to support a conviction, subject of course, to cross examination.In the here and now of 2009, Michigan's family courts have adhered to the "no-fault" provisions of the divorce statutes. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 10:28 am by Hilf & Hilf, PLC
  Under Michigan case law (People v Koon) it is not illegal for individual who is legally allowed to use marijuana to drive with marijuana in their system, as long as the driver is not under the influence of marijuana. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 10:58 am by Greg May
It is such influence in the absence of publication that leads presiding justice Kline, dissenting in People v. [read post]
Since 2014, over 24,000 people have died trying to cross the central Mediterranean, and over 41,000 have been rescued by the NGO SOS Mediterranee since 2016. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 1:00 am by Hull and Hull LLP
  Thankfully, in my experience, most people tend to enter into settlement agreements in good faith, and will more often than not abide by what they agreed to. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 10:09 am by Kent Scheidegger
" and so forth, and you may build a compelling case.Polygraph evidence is generally not admissible in court, although in United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 3:35 am
The Supreme Court approved that practice in United States v. [read post]
22 May 2008, 9:35 am
JD readers know, this is indeed something that consumes a great deal of time and mental anxiety for female lawyers and law students (I've posted in the forum about it here; sintecho has written about long v. short hair here; and a paralegal has written about her sartorial quandaries here). [read post]