Search for: "ROBERTS V. UNITED STATES "
Results 8441 - 8460
of 9,856
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2010, 7:30 pm
And although the State contended that a ruling covering both misadvice and omission would lead to a “flood” of challenges of existing guilty pleas made by noncitizen defendants, the Court countered that a similar concern was raised in Hill v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 7:34 am
§ 3582(c)(2) as “sentencings at which [United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 9:01 pm
In Padilla v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 2:05 pm
On Wednesday, March 31, 2010, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Padilla v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 1:45 pm
The Supreme Court issued an opinion in Padilla v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 9:55 am
INS v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 5:30 am
United States, involves application of the federal Sentencing Guidelines to a person being resentenced. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 10:22 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 1:42 pm
United States Patent and Trademark Office, et al. certainly could be a contender. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 6:15 am
RICO is codified as Chapter 96 of Title 18 of the United States Code, 18 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 5:48 am
Case 2: a foreign investor who purchases securities of a foreign issuer on a foreign exchange is harmed by fraud some component of which takes place within the United States. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 7:19 pm
United States Patent and Trademark Office, et al. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 2:28 pm
Morrison v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 2:17 pm
See, e.g., Medellin v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 9:28 am
The case was Morrison, et al., v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 6:07 pm
Iqbal is a 2009 decision of the United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) that may have an impact on the standard applied to motions to dismiss in state courts with rules that are modeled on the federal rules. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 4:28 pm
., v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 11:39 am
However, the court of appeals in Pajares v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 11:24 am
Mar. 10, 2010) (en banc), the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, sitting en banc, vacated the three-judge panel’s prior holding and affirmed the district court’s dismissal of a Rule 10b-5 claim asserted by the Securities & Exchange Commission (“SEC”) against defendants James Tambone and Robert Hussey. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 11:07 am
SCHORLEMER, M.D., AND ROBERT SCHORLEMER, M.D. v. [read post]
