Search for: "STATE V. POWERS"
Results 8441 - 8460
of 41,400
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2014, 11:38 am
United States), and will rule on whether a jury or a judge should decide the right of an owner of an older trademark to update it and still keep its legal status (Hana Financial v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 8:06 am
In Delaware v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 2:47 am
Nicastro v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 3:44 pm
Justice Rothstein stated as follows in the CBC v. [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 4:30 pm
The court acknowledged conflicting decisions on the point but quoted the Ninth Circuit’s decision in UMG Recordings v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 10:06 am
On February 11, 2015, the Supreme Court of New Jersey expressly adopted the test created by the United States Supreme Court in Faragher v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:46 am
This was the first published state court decision in California regarding employment arbitration agreements since the United States Supreme Court's groundbreaking decision in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 11:18 am
McLean Irrevocable Trust v. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 11:16 am
In State of Indiana v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 7:49 am
Will it be Chapter 7 v. 13? [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 6:00 am
The study was requested by Congress in the wake of the Supreme Court’s 2020 Allen v. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 6:00 am
The study was requested by Congress in the wake of the Supreme Court’s 2020 Allen v. [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 9:13 pm
In Spears v. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 1:53 pm
Despite potentially relevant Supreme Court precedent in Thomas and Granfinanciera, the better view under the weight of Supreme Court precedent with respect to patent validity, absent the recent decision by the Court in Oil States, is that determination of the validity of issued patents does not include the government as a party and, therefore, only private rights are involved. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 11:51 am
If a prosecutor so blatantly fails to do his job, surely there is swift and powerful punishment. [read post]
20 May 2015, 6:28 am
See United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 1:55 pm
Such pre-New Deal decisions as United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm
Should the state attorneys general have investigated Starbucks for not proclaiming the warnings of WHO? [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 5:03 am
In Diep v. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 4:00 pm
On Friday, the major US movie studios quietly backed away from the worst parts of the censorship power-grab they attempted in July in the Paramount v. [read post]
