Search for: "State v. Force"
Results 8441 - 8460
of 32,554
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2019, 1:30 am
The Role of Hospital Ethics Committees V. [read post]
27 Sep 2012, 11:31 am
This just in: the United States Supreme Court accepted review of a crucial case involving DWIs - the case of Missouri v. [read post]
13 Aug 2024, 5:12 pm
Learn how you can avoid confiscation or forced deletion of media, and keep your movements and associations private. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 1:07 pm
United States, 1990 WL 124496, at *3 (9th Cir. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 6:45 am
Phil Bryant couldn’t have been any clearer in his State of the State address, “On this unfortunate anniversary of Roe v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 6:11 am
As in Hylton v. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 6:05 am
Claiming exempt volunteer firefighter status for the purposes of Civil Service Law §75.1(b)Serviss v Incorporated Vil. of Floral Park, 2018 NY Slip Op 05597, Appellate Division, Second Department§75.1 of the Civil Service Laws generally bars the termination of a tenured officer or employee in the Competitive Class of Classified Service of the State or a political subdivision of the State "except for incompetency or misconduct shown after a hearing upon… [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:48 pm
Div. 1993), even if the test constitutes only a “minimal intrusion,” State v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 5:00 am
The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the search of three residences in a Kansas City methamphetamine case in United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 1:43 pm
The case is People v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 5:00 am
In Thompson v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 4:57 am
Lord Kerr also makes one of the key arguments for imposing liability on the police when he states that the police should not be exempted from liability to protect others from third party harm in the same way that members of the public are exempted from this duty, because it is the police force’s duty to provide precisely that kind of protection: it is “the essential and critical obligation of the police force”. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 11:49 am
They also argue that the schools they are forced to attend are schools in name only, and so the state cannot justify the restriction on their liberty imposed by compulsory attendance. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 8:44 am
In McDonnell v. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 9:47 am
In a trio of cases - United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 10:50 am
The following contribution to our symposium on Kiobel v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 9:07 am
United States (1930). [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 3:21 am
The Standard of Professional Behaviour in the 2008 and 2012 Police (Conduct) Regulations does not expressly state whether the criminal law test or the civil law test applies in police disciplinary proceedings in relation to the use of force. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
Wong and United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 12:04 am
On the product page, they state: *OS X Leopard Will not be preinstalled or included. [read post]
