Search for: "State v. Olds" Results 8441 - 8460 of 20,940
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2012, 7:53 am
Pettaway the state Supreme Court upheld a $4 million award to the family of a 32-year-old mobile woman who died at Springhill Memorial Hospital in Mobile. [read post]
10 May 2011, 7:01 pm by Kenneth J. Vanko
--Court: United States District Court for the Western District of VirginiaOpinion Date: 5/4/11Cite: McClain & Co., Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2009, 9:52 am
Today, the 28-year-old Ph.D. candidate in the Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology (HST) received the prestigious $30,000 Lemelson-MIT Student Prize for his promising innovations in the area of cancer therapy, specifically two inventions in nanomedicine: a new class of cancer therapeutics...Foreign Patent Owners Safe From Declaratory JudgmentIn a decision that is simply painful to read, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit yesterday decided… [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 6:19 pm
The report also quoted Alan Gura, the 37-year-old lawyer who won the recent Second Amendment case in his very first argument before the Court. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 10:26 pm by Frank Cranmer
That right might therefore be overridden by a state body, provided there was a sufficiently pressing need to do so for one of the purposes in Article 9(2) and the means used were both lawful and proportionate, applying the four-stage proportionality test in Bank Mellat v Her Majesty’s Treasury (No 2) (SC(E)) [2014] AC 700 [at 20] and allowing the state body an appropriate discretionary area of judgment. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 10:52 pm
Sometimes I long for the good old days of caveat emptor in Real Estate transactions. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 6:25 am
Our state's highest court agreed that Sedlock's defense had been unfairly impacted by the lack of factual particulars.While the prosecution need not provide a defendant with "precise" dates and times, any interval given must be sufficiently detailed (or "narrow") so as to allow the accused an opportunity to respond to the charges made. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 10:51 am
            In Mathis v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 8:52 am by Christine Dowling
  She chose neither course . . .The majority distinguished Herring v. [read post]