Search for: "State v. So " Results 8441 - 8460 of 116,406
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2011, 10:20 am by David Oscar Markus
It should be no surprise that as the volume increases, so do the number of imprecise laws. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:45 am by Matthew Ryder QC, Matrix
In the last two years the Supreme Court has grappled with this conundrum in various ways: in relation to control orders; allegations of terrorist financing (SSHD v AF [2009] UKHL 28); compensation for those who have suffered miscarriage of justice (R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18); and criminal conduct as the subject of disciplinary proceedings (R (G) v The Governors of X School [2011] UKSC 30). [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 6:55 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Criminal Opinions Body: Here is today's criminal law Appellate Court opinion:   AC32157 - State v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 5:03 am by Marianna Lambrou
A special contribution is a contribution deemed so exceptional in nature that it justifies a departure from the sharing principle starting point of equal (50:50) division of the marital assets. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 6:48 am by Eric Goldman
Konrath State Legislator Doesn’t Understand That He Works for the Government–Attwood v. [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 2:31 am
That's why criminal cases have captions like State of Ohio v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 8:11 am by Eric Goldman
If so, this opens up the door to unlimited liability for a panoply of state law claims we don’t normally see against Internet services–like aiding-and-abetting trespass to real property. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
While the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in its recent judgment Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner (discussed here), does not mention the words “measures of mass surveillance” it states that it is concerned about measures “authoris[ing], on a generalised basis, storage of all the personal data of all the persons”. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 2:17 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Plaintiffs also withdrew a challenge filed with the Ohio Supreme Court so that they could refile in a state trial court. [read post]