Search for: "Strong v. State" Results 8441 - 8460 of 16,401
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2011, 9:09 am by Alison Rowe
            The nature of the facts varies enormously in the hundreds of ClassicStar cases pending across the United States from cases in which the horse leasing taxpayers had very strong facts, and would likely win at trial, to cases such as Van Wickler. [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 9:08 pm by Lyle Denniston
 Tuesday, the Supreme Court is scheduled to hold one hour of oral argument on the solicitation of campaign donations by judicial candidates, in the case of Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
”[3] “Because the regulation of crime is preeminently a matter for the States, we have identified ‘a strong judicial policy against federal interference with state criminal proceedings. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 9:00 am by Jack Sharman
It is not uncommon for prosecutors and agents to discourage witnesses – sometimes, in strong terms that would get defense counsel charged with obstruction of justice or witness tampering, were defense counsel to do the same – from speaking to anyone about their grand jury testimony and especially from speaking to subjects or targets. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 11:30 am
In this decision, Justice Katju has continued his strong criticism of the use of traditional principles of statutory interpretation. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 3:21 pm by Tung Yin
 That's not a barrier to federal prosecution; the infamous Gun-Free School Zones Act case, U.S. v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 3:02 am
Supreme Court's 2008 judgment in Baze v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:45 pm by Rick Hasen
  But Judge Reinhardt issued a nine-page concurring opinion, which begins with the point that the state of Nevada is likely to succeed on the merits: “I wish to make clear that the panel is in agreement that the basis for our grant of the stay of the district court’s order pursuant to Winter v. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 4:00 pm by Steve Vladeck
” But putting that aside, I think the far more significant point for present purposes is how inconsistent the Fourth Circuit’s analysis of Brehm’s contacts is with the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces’ analysis in United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 8:26 am by Anita Davies
The Telegraph has already suggested that David Cameron may use the speech as ammunition in the ongoing debate over the Strasbourg court’s decision in Hirst v UK (App No. 74025/01) on prisoners’ voting rights. [read post]