Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 8441 - 8460
of 14,274
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2015, 5:36 pm
For example, the SJC has permitted such checkpoints as an exception to the individual suspicion requirement “‘on the grounds that a “reasonable” roadblock involves a “minimal” state intrusion upon the reduced privacy of drivers, one that is outweighed by the strong public interest in reducing the carnage caused by drunk drivers,’” as Judge Hely said, quoting the SJC’s 1989 Commonwealth v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 9:07 am
Old Railroad Bed, LLC v. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 5:54 am
The state Legislature approved the measure, S. 48, with strong bipartisan support, by a 99-40 House vote and a 137-4 tally in the Senate. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 5:02 am
As you may have seen, the jury in Marchuk v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 10:22 am
State-on-top habeas case Woods v. [read post]
3 May 2008, 3:01 pm
These employers think that even if the wife makes twice as much as her husband, she should quit her job to raise the children.A more poignant way of expressing this can be found in Knussman v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 10:09 pm
Eng wrote for the panel in Matter of Vinluan v. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 7:10 am
Furthermore, as stated in the syllabus for his presentation (posted on his blog) Hindert will apparently be coaching people seeking to invest in factoring deals. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 8:31 am
Investment Policy Committee v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 4:22 pm
Since Mrs Justice Collins Rice handed down judgment in Fox v Blake [2024] EWHC 146 (KB) there has been a lot of online discussion about the case. [read post]
20 Feb 2025, 11:08 am
" (Linda R.S v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 7:06 am
[v. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 11:27 am
” United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 9:02 am
Seibert and United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 1:44 pm
In Stenberg v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 4:24 am
Finally, State v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 9:09 am
Find that the case is moot and vacate the PTAB decisions upholding the patent under cases such as United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 12:55 am
Stewart J held there would be strong reasons for not enforcing the exclusive foreign jurisdiction clause even if it were incorporated and enforceable: Karpik v Carnival plc (The Ruby Princess) (Stay Application) [2021] FCA 1082; (2021) 157 ACSR 1, [331]. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 6:58 am
An agreement providing for immediate and strong action within all areas of the Bali mandates. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 5:30 am
[v] Second, other commentators reveal there is no support at all in the legislative history of the FAA for the idea that the Act was intended to prohibit state laws that preserve the right of claimants to arbitrate collectively. [read post]
