Search for: "Test Plaintiff"
Results 8441 - 8460
of 21,967
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2016, 8:19 am
§1983 for violation of a plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment rights. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 6:54 am
The court again rejected the plaintiffs’ contrary argument that mandatory drug testing policies reduced workplace injuries, finding their declarations devoid of facts to support their belief that mandatory post-accident drug testing was more effective than other forms of drug testing, or why the elimination or modification of post-accident drug testing would necessarily result in increased injuries if other drug testing remained in place. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 6:27 am
The plaintiffs requested an emergency injunction, which the court granted on a nationwide basis. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 6:14 am
Swan alleges that the government did not inform him that he needed to follow-up his test results with a colonoscopy. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 3:03 am
Judge Mazzant said that the doubling of the salary threshold was probably illegal because it effectively eliminated the duties test. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 9:50 am
” The plaintiff failed several field sobriety tests, and a portable breath test indicated a blood alcohol content above 0.08 percent. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 1:57 pm
The plaintiffs alleged that OSHA did not have authority to create the new enforcement tool for retaliation, and that OSHA disregarded substantial evidence supporting that routine, mandatory drug and alcohol testing actually enhances workplace safety. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 12:50 pm
Louisiana 15-8114 Issues: (1) Whether, when counsel fully concedes the client’s guilt to all charges over the client’s express objection, counsel’s performance amounts to a complete failure to subject the prosecution’s case to meaningful adversarial testing so that the United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 8:54 am
If they can make such a showing, the burden then shifts to the defendants, who must show that use of race in redistricting was narrowly tailored to advance a compelling government interest – a test known as strict scrutiny. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 4:00 am
The Eleventh Circuit seems to have raised the bar too high in these cases and where, as here, there was proof of direct copying and preparation of a derivative work, the jury should have had the opportunity to test the credibility of the evidence and make findings of fact.The three wise monkeys (Japanese: 三猿, Hepburn: san'en or sanzaru? [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 4:00 am
The Eleventh Circuit seems to have raised the bar too high in these cases and where, as here, there was proof of direct copying and preparation of a derivative work, the jury should have had the opportunity to test the credibility of the evidence and make findings of fact.The three wise monkeys (Japanese: 三猿, Hepburn: san'en or sanzaru? [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 4:00 am
The Eleventh Circuit seems to have raised the bar too high in these cases and where, as here, there was proof of direct copying and preparation of a derivative work, the jury should have had the opportunity to test the credibility of the evidence and make findings of fact.The three wise monkeys (Japanese: 三猿, Hepburn: san'en or sanzaru? [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 2:42 am
Seeing the video, his probation officer asks Ethan to come in for a drug test. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 10:54 am
However, the complaint must be rejected to the extent that Plaintiff is additionally seeking an injunction, a recall, the removal from distribution channels, and the destruction of patent-infringing products. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 7:45 am
He also found that the plaintiffs had failed to show that the balance of equities and public interest weighed in favor of the plaintiffs. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 5:48 am
The tests indicated those injuries were at least from two weeks prior. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 5:48 am
The tests indicated those injuries were at least from two weeks prior. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 4:10 am
According to the legislature, the test for a sufficient link with the Netherlands is compatible with Brussels I, because it does not concern the jurisdictional test but the certification of a civil action, which is a matter of national civil procedure. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 2:44 am
By 'enough' I mean a substantial number of the plaintiff's customers or potential customers deceived for there to be a real effect on the plaintiff's trade or goodwill. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 1:47 pm
The court reasoned that by the DOL significantly increasing the minimum salary level, it essentially created “a de facto salary-only test,” which Congress did not intend. [read post]
