Search for: "United States v. District Court" Results 8441 - 8460 of 34,743
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2012, 1:36 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Amgen then filed a petition to the United States Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 7:11 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
Morris, the Eleventh Circuit reversed the United States District Court and ruled that provisions in H&R Block’s employment agreement with its former employee, Vicki D. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 7:50 am by Kali Borkoski
The Court did not grant certiorari in any new cases, nor did it invite the Solicitor General to file briefs expressing the views of the United States. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 8:21 pm by Amy Howe
” In its brief on the merits, the United States starts by reiterating that, under the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 8:37 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Dallas and Fort Worth Life insurance attorneys need to read this 2006, opinion from the United States District Court, Southern District of Texas, Houston Division. [read post]
District Court for the Northern District of California—commonly referred to as the “Food Court” even though more food labelling cases are now filed in New York federal courts—recently addressed that question in Montera v. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 6:55 am by Sergio F. Oehninger and Paul T. Moura
Oct. 6, 2017), the United States District Court for the Central District of California held that a “war” exclusion barred insurance coverage for losses arising from NBCUniversal’s decision to postpone and relocate production of its action-thriller miniseries Dig, due to an armed conflict between Israel and Hamas. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 6:55 am by Sergio F. Oehninger
Oct. 6, 2017), the United States District Court for the Central District of California held that a “war” exclusion barred insurance coverage for losses arising from NBCUniversal’s decision to postpone and relocate production of its action-thriller miniseries Dig, due to an armed conflict between Israel and Hamas. [read post]
25 May 2015, 3:23 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The Supreme Court of the United States has stated that there are two critical elements necessary to make a criminal or penal law ex post facto: 1) it must be retrospective, and 2) it must disadvantage the offender affected by it, (Champelle v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
 Moreover, I note that "United States district court decisions are not controlling authority in this Court. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 7:49 am
No. 07-308, United States v. [read post]