Search for: "York v York"
Results 8441 - 8460
of 51,497
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2021, 12:11 pm
“Synod,” The Catholic Encyclopedia, vol. 14, New York, 1912. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 10:08 am
(See Stern v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 9:39 am
“Most of the interview was talking about the impact of this Supreme Court decision, Wyeth v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 9:36 am
State v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 9:00 am
As the Court of Appeals held in Fappiano v New York City Police Dept., 95 NY2d 738, "[a]ll government records are presumptively open for public inspection unless specifically exempted from disclosure as provided in the Public Officers Law" and further explained in Gould v New York City Police Dept., 89 NY2d 267, a government agency may withhold records sought pursuant to FOIL only if it "articulate[s] particularized and specific justification for… [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 8:15 am
In a recent Brooklyn case entitled College Apartments, LLC v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 6:41 am
New York, 592 U.S. ____ (2020), was not ripe for judicial review. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 5:35 am
v=yI3i8aov7g8. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 5:27 am
The striking of a pleading may be appropriate where there is a clear showing that the failure to comply with discovery demands or court-ordered discovery was the result of willful and contumacious conduct (see Ozeri v Ozeri, 135 AD3d 838, 839 [2016]; McArthur v New York City Hous. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 4:36 am
In last week’s New York Business Divorce, Peter Mahler wrote about an important new decision with far-reaching implications for New York LLC owners. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 12:00 am
As the Court of Appeals held in Fappiano v New York City Police Dept., 95 NY2d 738, "[a]ll government records are presumptively open for public inspection unless specifically exempted from disclosure as provided in the Public Officers Law" and further explained in Gould v New York City Police Dept., 89 NY2d 267, a government agency may withhold records sought pursuant to FOIL only if it "articulate[s] particularized and specific justification for… [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 9:01 pm
In Fedor v. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 4:38 pm
Strandburg, New York University School of Law. [read post]
23 Jan 2021, 4:02 pm
Consortum, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2021, 2:53 pm
To my mind, New Hampshire v. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 1:04 pm
.), first obtained by the New York Times. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 11:45 am
In the November 2020 case of Ochse v. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 7:43 am
Se trata del caso Roe v. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 7:23 am
" This is because Hurd's release was mandatory under New York law. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 7:08 am
In 1964, the Supreme Court considered another landmark case, New York Times v. [read post]
