Search for: "Beare v. State"
Results 8461 - 8480
of 15,029
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2024, 6:11 pm
Here also is a map that summarizes this (from this article); the dark gray states are the ones where this sort of firing is most likely to be illegal: For a case bearing on whether government employers may fire employees for saying, after an assassination attempt on the President, "If they go for him again, I hope they get him," see Rankin v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 8:39 am
Maxbounty CA Appeals Court: Claims Under State Spam Statute Not Preempted by CAN-SPAM – Hypertouch v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 9:24 am
Jackson v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 3:13 pm
The decisive difference between the two approaches is the burden of proof; according to the traditional view, the state that opposes another state’s jurisdictional assertion must prove the existence of a rule under international law prohibiting the assertion of criminal jurisdiction and according to the modern approach, by contrast, the state that asserts extraterritorial jurisdiction bears the burden of proof. [read post]
13 Aug 2024, 11:52 am
On August 2, 2024, in Texas Medical Association, et al. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 7:39 am
The state of Florida requires all milk sold in the state to contain Vitamin A. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 6:00 am
Mulligan V, Attorney Do you know what Tort Reform is? [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 4:29 pm
Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in TransUnion LLC v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 3:47 am
To avoid defending an action, the insurer bears the burden of showing that the claim is not even potentially covered (see United States Fid. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 4:29 am
State of Maharashtra & Ors. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 9:58 am
§340.4 has no bearing on such actions. 3 Witkin, Cal. [read post]
11 May 2011, 4:54 am
State Patent Bureau of the Republic of Lithuania (Kluwer Patent Blog) Spain: Modification of EP translations (2) – Supreme Court grants fourth appeal, filed again by Pfizer: EP0325571 (PatLit) US: Federal Trade Commission issues report on reverse settlement agreements in FY2010 (Patent Docs) (Orange Book Blog) (FDA Law Blog) US: FTC posts friendly reminder to please send them your ANDA litigation settlement agreements (Orange Book Blog) US: Billups-Rothenberg v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 2:38 am
To avoid defending an action, the insurer bears the burden of showing that the claim is not even potentially covered (see United States Fid. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:00 pm
KRISTINA PASCARELLA AND ANNA D’ ANTONIO, Petitioner,v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 8:01 am
United States. [read post]
4 May 2021, 4:23 pm
And no one could doubt that America was initially built on a de facto reality of significantly open borders, at least if one were not a "vicious pauper," in the language of Mayor of New York v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 10:14 am
Yesterday the United States Tax Court issued an opinion in Sanders v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 8:33 am
“Channel One Russia Worldwide” v. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 4:00 pm
On PatLit, Stefano Barazza's thoughtful post on the invalidation of a patent for lip and facial synchronisation of animated characters gives us an insight into life in the United States after Alice v CLS Bank revived the old-fashioned notion that patents are for inventive concepts and not for abstract ideas. [read post]
