Search for: "Billings v. United States" Results 8461 - 8480 of 10,162
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2008, 1:00 am
- Counterfeit cash flooding the market: (Afro-IP), Debranded fakes for Liberia: an update: (Afro-IP), South African music industry blames pirates for falling sales of local artists: (Afro-IP), Plaintiff obtains interlocutory relief in patent case Sanitam Services Limited v Bins (Nairobi) Services Limited: (Afro-IP), South Africa – new patent judgments: Buckman Laboratories v Bromine Compounds; Northpark Trading 3 (Pty) Ltd v Ausplow (Pty) Ltd:… [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 6:05 am by Kelly
The bill has been introduced – and passed – before. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 7:02 am by Ana Popovich
One example is the May 10 settlement between the U.S. and the University of Miami (UM), which agreed to pay $22 million to resolve allegations that it “routinely ordered medically unnecessary laboratory tests and used misleading billing practices to increase their reimbursement from Medicare,” a WNN article states. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 7:45 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
In response to these types of concerns, about a dozen bills were introduced in the US Congress and state legislatures last year. [read post]
14 May 2014, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Hobby Lobby’s interpretation that it does would open the floodgates to exempt every business owner in the United States from the anti-discrimination laws, because there is no real middle ground. [read post]
22 May 2014, 2:11 pm by Gene Quinn
On Thursday, December 5, 2013, the United States House of Representatives passed the Innovation Act by a vote of 325-91. [read post]
13 Nov 2022, 12:16 am by Frank Cranmer
Ilyin and Others v Ukraine (no. 74852/14): about the Kyiv City State Administration’s refusal to register a community of the Unification Church. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 4:45 pm by INFORRM
Ireland The Irish Legal News had a piece “Work recommences on defamation reform bill”. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 12:42 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
 The Wells Fargo choice-of-law paragraph states as follows: This Agreement and your account, as well as our rights and duties and your rights and duties regarding this Agreement and your account, will be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the United States and, to the extent applicable, the law of the State of South Dakota, regardless of where you reside or use your account at any time. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 12:35 pm by Pierre Gooding
On June 28, 2012, the United States Supreme Court ruled in National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 5:45 am by Keegan McBride
To prevent China’s influence in the world’s Internet infrastructure, the United States and its allies have heavily resisted Chinese undersea cable projects. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 8:30 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Public Citizen argued our 60th case before the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 1:30 pm by WIMS
The Administration is committed to promoting nuclear power in the United States and developing a safe, long-term solution for the management of used nuclear fuel and nuclear waste. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 9:44 am by Chinmayi Sharma
” Critical to this, he described, was the maintenance of the United States’ “longstanding bipartisan commitment to strengthen Ukraine’s security. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 8:38 am by Retirement Blogger
CalPERS explained that the recent federal district court decision (State of California v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Tom Schmidt, in his marvelous contribution explaining how the Judges’ Bill of 1925 changed the implicit nature of Supreme Court decisions and authority, illustrates the point well. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 10:27 am by Kristen E. Polovoy
A facial challenge to Act 120 would succeed if a substantial number of its applications are unconstitutional, judged in relation to the statute’s plainly legitimate sweep (United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 10:27 am by Kristen E. Polovoy
A facial challenge to Act 120 would succeed if a substantial number of its applications are unconstitutional, judged in relation to the statute’s plainly legitimate sweep (United States v. [read post]