Search for: "David C " Results 8461 - 8480 of 9,823
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2009, 10:00 am
Melinda Katz, City Councilwoman, Queens John Liu, City Councilman, Queens David Weprin, City Councilman, Queens David Yassky, City Councilman, Brooklyn Submit your Questions for the Candidates Here! [read post]
4 May 2009, 7:19 am
Rev. 1489, 1494 n. 21 (2005). 2        Michael C. [read post]
4 May 2009, 6:26 am
David Easterling, No. 100,454 (Shawnee)Sentencing appealChristopher M. [read post]
2 May 2009, 10:12 am
CHARLES POLLOCK AND TRACY POLLOCK, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIENDS OF SARAH JANE POLLOCK, A MINOR CHILD; from Bexar County; 4th district (04-03-00403-CV, 155 SW3d 322, 08-18-04) The Court reverses the court of appeals' judgment and renders judgment.Justice Hecht delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Jefferson, Justice Wainwright, Justice Johnson, and Justice Willett joined, and in all but Part II-C of which Justice Brister joined.Justice Medina delivered a… [read post]
1 May 2009, 1:47 pm
§ 924(c)(1)(A), which provides for a mandatory minimum sentence where a defendant uses a firearm during a drug trafficking crime. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 8:53 am
      Conclude by reminding the jury of the worst harm in your case. c. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 8:47 am
David Salmons then appeared on behalf of respondent T.A. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 5:11 am
"I think supervisors dropped the ball," said David Rudovsky, a prominent civil-rights attorney who specializes in police misconduct cases. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 9:46 pm
David Charles Orams, Linda Elizabeth Orams). [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 7:37 pm
Following this afternoon's brief recess, the prosecution returned to an overcrowded courtroom to announce the dismissal of its case against Robert C. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 1:23 pm
The causes of action relate to Claimants' investments in the Regions MK Select High Income-C Fund (RHICX), hereinafter referred to as the "Fund". [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 5:33 pm
A thoughtful article about the Supreme Court's "seizure" doctrine, so much a part of the all encompassing reasonable suspicion standard, by David K. [read post]