Search for: "English v. English"
Results 8461 - 8480
of 11,204
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2011, 3:22 pm
The cases we have discussed on implied exclusion of Part I of the Indian Arbitration Act are composed of three variants – first, the contract designates a foreign proper law but no seat of arbitration (for example Indtel Technical Services v WS Atkins and Citation Infowares v Equinox Corporation), secondly, the contract designates a foreign seat of arbitration but no proper law, and thirdly the contract designates a foreign proper law and a foreign seat of arbitration (Dozco… [read post]
16 May 2011, 12:52 pm
" Setting aside the abuse of the English language, however, I think I preferred our style of furlough. [read post]
16 May 2011, 11:52 am
In the increasingly heated debate about the state of English privacy law, the courts have frequently been accused of seeking to introduce a privacy law “by the backdoor”. [read post]
16 May 2011, 9:40 am
Robert Lawson, Tim Marland p.99-108 # Sovereignty and the Chicago Convention: English Court of Appeal Rules on the Northern Cyprus Question Mark Franklin p.109-116 # Metal Neutrality and the Nation-Bound Airline Industry Paul V. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:49 am
For a few years now, I've been following the case if CIGNA v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:48 am
Rosalind English has posted her analysis of the judgment this morning. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:37 am
In Mujur Bakat Sdn Bhd v Uni. [read post]
15 May 2011, 5:04 pm
We posted a case comment on this and Rosalind English’s survey of the other coverage. [read post]
15 May 2011, 9:32 am
Kevin Q. v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 10:28 pm
Just published is the latest English-language article by Mireille Delmas-Marty (left). [read post]
13 May 2011, 3:20 pm
207/10Orifarm A/S and Orifarm Supply A/S v Merck & Co. [read post]
13 May 2011, 1:33 pm
The website also includes an English and Dutch version translation of the court decision in the case. [read post]
13 May 2011, 10:46 am
[Due to some problems with Blogger, our yesterday's post on Videocon v Union of India got deleted. [read post]
13 May 2011, 9:44 am
; Holder v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
13 May 2011, 7:09 am
In effect, English law on the misuse of private information remains unchanged. [read post]
13 May 2011, 5:39 am
Barnes v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 8:15 am
” English v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V The requested Party shall not be bound to extradite its own nationals, but it shall have the power to extradite them in its discretion. [read post]
11 May 2011, 12:14 pm
Under Celotex Corp. v. [read post]
