Search for: "House v. House"
Results 8461 - 8480
of 41,244
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2017, 6:00 am
United States and Humphrey's Executor v. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 9:03 pm
The South African Health Products Regulatory Authority announced that it would not approve the Sputnik-V COVID-19 vaccine for use. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 5:45 am
Sharon drove up in her van shortly thereafter with her two young daughters and parked along the street in front of the house. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 8:50 pm
Board), racial bias in the criminal legal system (Powell v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 4:57 am
As an example of such adjustment, the court pointed to the judgment of the House of Lords in R v Waya [2012] UKSC 51. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 5:25 am
In Department of Agriculture Rural Development Rural Housing Service v. [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 2:05 pm
The Judge was wrong to find as a matter of law and fact that Ground 8 in Schedule 2 to Housing Act 1988 was proven. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 9:11 am
Following on from the Case Preview (here), the Supreme Court handed down judgment in Arnold v Britton & Ors on 10 June 2015 in which the appellants’ appeal was dismissed by a majority of 4-1. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 6:08 am
First, in United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 1:29 am
Evelyn was found by her mother at home motionless in bed with the house telephone in her hand. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 12:47 pm
Cowans v. [read post]
2 Nov 2008, 11:10 am
The Hearing in Wyeth v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
” And moving beyond the courts, oaths might even be beyond the capacity of other members of the legislature to judge: in Bond v. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 4:29 pm
Jones, 445 U.S. 480, 494 (1980); Parham v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 2:10 pm
(E.R.) v S(H.C.), 1998 CanLII 4619 [3] W.C.L. v A.J.L, 2003 BCSC 971 [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 3:55 am
He's the former former New York City policeman who accidentally shot himself in the knee when a defective chair broke at his precinct house. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
(The Knowsley argument, paralleling the finding on assured tenants on Knowsley Housing Trust v White, link to our report) ii) Brent v Knightley was wrongly decided, such that the right to apply under s.85 Housing Act 1985 survived the (ex) tenant's death iii) Such a right to apply is a possession under article 1, Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights iv) To hold that the right to apply did not survive death would be in breach of Art 1 Protocol… [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
(The Knowsley argument, paralleling the finding on assured tenants on Knowsley Housing Trust v White, link to our report) ii) Brent v Knightley was wrongly decided, such that the right to apply under s.85 Housing Act 1985 survived the (ex) tenant's death iii) Such a right to apply is a possession under article 1, Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights iv) To hold that the right to apply did not survive death would be in breach of Art 1 Protocol… [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 2:04 pm
She also failed in a judicial review of RKBC’s newly restrictive planning policy on basement developments, and of course won in the House of Lords on proprietary estoppel, but lost on unjust enrichment in Yeomans Row v Cobbe (2008) UKHL 55. [read post]
22 Sep 2004, 10:41 am
I am posting an exchange from the BOPWatch listserve, which directly pertains to the Goldings v. [read post]
