Search for: "In Re: Designation of Judges"
Results 8461 - 8480
of 9,824
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2009, 3:22 pm
There are of course cases where a decision-making body is the last judge of the law it has to apply. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 7:41 am
He suggested performance goals for the judges, focused on delayed decision making, more status reports from the judges, more evaluations of judges and moving judges to understaffed parts. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 7:23 am
Courts, Statistical Information on Motions to Dismiss re Twombly/Iqbal: Dec 2009 shows that there has been an increase in motions to dismiss and a slight increase in motions granted after the Iqbal decision. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 4:56 am
A recent study by New York’s Division of Probation and Correctional Alternatives found that of 19,827 offenders registered as of March 31, 2005, the re-arrest rate for a new sex crime within one year from the date of first registration was 2 percent; re-arrest within two years was 3 percent; within five years, 6 percent; and within eight years, 8 percent. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 6:20 pm
If we allow judges to modify mortgages on primary residences, chances are they'll never get the chance… because the banks will modify them… like they're supposed to. 5. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 6:39 pm
If you’re not fighting your ass off for the ideals that protect your clients, then as far as I’m concerned you’re a crappy criminal defense lawyer. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 1:01 am
The fact is, when the president’s plan was designed, it was said to differ from Bush’s Hope-4-Homeowners program because it offered a “carrot and a stickâ€. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 12:46 pm
You know we're going to go read that case. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 3:00 am
(GRAY on Claims) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Blocking attorneys from simultaneously litigating and prosecuting patents: In re Deutsche Bank Trust (Patently-O) CAFC: Muscle ad in magazine invalidates patent: Iovate Health Science Inc v Bio-Engineered Supplements & Nutrition Inc (IPKat) (IP Directions) CAFC: If patent troll sends the letter, then a case-or-controversy ‘implicitly’ is asserted: HP v Acceleron (ISinIP) District Court S D Florida denies summary… [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
Click Here Judge: Livingston broke the law. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 2:47 pm
Its principal testified: "[m]y main objection was that basically this was a large corporation coming at me and saying, telling us what to do, and, oh, by the way you're going to pay for it, too.... [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:44 am
See In re MERSCORP, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 3:26 am
Last month, the Eastern District of Louisiana held the US government liable for $719,698 to owners of four homes flooded by Hurricane Katrina, because it had negligently operated and maintained key infrastructure.In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Consolidated Litigation, Judge Duval held that the Army Corps of Engineers had statutory immunity for the design and construction of the Mississippi River Gulf Outlet (MRGO), an artificial waterway for ship traffic from the Gulf of… [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 4:43 pm
The Circuit Court upheld their convictions, finding no legaldefect in the trial judge's failure to instruct jurors on what proof was needed to show "honest services" fraud in the private sector. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 4:11 pm
After a year of watching this mess unfold every single day, I’ve only got one question: Was HAMP designed for homeowners… or was it designed for banks? [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 6:42 am
If you're considering bankruptcy, we can explain your options and help you decide if it's right for you. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 1:47 pm
Case Designation Every filing shall contain, in its caption, the Master File Number 70-CV-09-19459. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 8:48 am
 Moreover, given the high quality of Judge Vaughan’s opinion in the first case, he is likely going to get this right. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 6:36 am
Gordon of Westboro and James Hester of Shrewsbury said their departments have officers designated to track the towns’ registered offenders. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 9:43 pm
The judge could also order that the case be re-tried, in which case you have to again go through steps 1 through 4. [read post]
