Search for: "JOHN DOE, 5" Results 8461 - 8480 of 8,652
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2007, 12:49 am
From Associated Content: The ruling 5-4 stated that the courts reviewing the cases failed to follow the guidance of the high court. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 7:02 pm
  (Photo by Ho John Lee at [www.flickr.com]; license details there.) [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 2:26 pm
The fact that Chief Justice John G. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 9:50 am
  The memo particularly of concern here was written by John Yoo and Robert Delahunty, and addressed the applicability of Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions to detainees captured around the world, who were alleged to be members of al-Qaeda. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 8:49 am
S. 320, 327-328, does not have the effect of imposing an unconstitutional burden on the abortion right. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 8:38 am
The 5-4 ruling said the Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act that Congress passed and President Bush signed into law in 2003 does not violate a woman's constitutional right to an abortion. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 8:21 am
The Associated Press reports: The Supreme Court upheld the nationwide ban on a controversial abortion procedure Wednesday, handing abortion opponents the long- awaited victory they expected from a more conservative bench.The 5-4 ruling said the Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act that Congress passed and President Bush signed into law in 2003 does not violate a woman's constitutional right to an abortion.The opponents of the act "have not demonstrated that the Act would be… [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 8:03 am
Souter and John Paul Stevens. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 12:02 am
" He subpoenaed President Kennedy, Pope John Paul II and Jesus. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 5:48 am
President George W.Bush's appointees voted 34-5 against granting appeals.By contrast, President Carter's appointees voted 31-4 in favor of inmateappeals.Clinton and Reagan appointees were more moderate. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 2:57 am
Remember that the RIAA does not presently have your identity, and that by calling them or visiting their web site you may be giving them your identity.5. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 12:12 pm
The fact that the 30 percent expressed their desire prior to the coverage does not clearly invalidate their desire. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 3:02 am
The concept of cumulative error does not require reversal of McClelland's conviction. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 1:38 am
Court is an all 1890 castOf judges who live long in the past,And whose ideas reflect reaction.Thus, if you desire a decision from hell,Just look to David Sentelle.He so often seems to be thereWhen some form of scumbaggery pervades the air.A protégé of Jesse Helms --Jesse Helms for crying out loud --He always leads the reactionary crowdWhen there is dirty work to be done.Here is one:When the right wing felt an apparently fair Whitewater… [read post]