Search for: "Nation v. Nation" Results 8461 - 8480 of 56,689
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2024, 3:07 pm by Mark Ashton
The implications can be said to be national in scope as individual states step forward with their own interpretations of  Dobbs v. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 2:29 am
The Court noted that, although the Board of Appeal examined the possibility that the public concerned would establish a link between the marks at issue, it first based its analysis on an incorrect assessment of the similarity of the marks at issue [average, not ‘at most very low’].Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 LV argued that the Board of Appeal could not simply state that it was not bound by previous EUIPO decision-making practice or earlier national… [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 2:55 pm by Mark A. Spognardi
The Government argued that the National Muffler standard had been superseded by the Court’s 1984 decision in Chevron U.S.A. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 3:33 am by sally
Articles 320(1) and (2) of the Directive precluded a national provision which provided for the deferral, until the subsequent supply under the normal value added tax scheme, of the right of the taxable dealer to deduct value added tax paid on importation of goods other than works of art, collectors’ items or antiques. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 1:55 pm by WIMS
In that complaint, Indian Harbor sought reimbursement under Section 330 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 1993, Pub. [read post]
12 May 2023, 2:21 pm by Gordon Firemark
Garland. 45 F.4th 1059 (1st Cir. 2022) (cert Denied USSC No. 22-665. (2023)) Yosemite National Park – Reflection in Merced River of Yosemite waterfalls and beautiful mountain landscape, California, USAIn Price v. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 1:14 am
Abbey National v Miller [2006] EWCA Civ 1520; [2007] EWCA Civ 138 Miller-Foulds v Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs [2008] EWHC 3443 (Ch); [2009] EWCA Civ 1132 You'd be forgiven for not having noticed any of this (long running) litigation over the last 3 years (if only because you need both Casetrack and Lawtel in order to find all four judgments, none of which seem to be on Bailii). [read post]