Search for: "People v. New"
Results 8461 - 8480
of 41,483
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2016, 2:28 pm
See Globe Newspaper Co. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 6:04 am
In Clews v. [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 6:04 am
In Clews v. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
In Urso v. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 9:30 pm
The New York Public Library says, Not on our watch. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 2:17 pm
[Legal Juice] * King v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 11:21 pm
Assn v. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 9:20 am
Here is a round up of some of the news going around the IP blogosphere….It's a big world out there...Patents The Kluwer Patent Blog provides coverage of VMI Holland v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 1:24 pm
I told him about cases such as Bauman v Fussell and Temple Island v New English Teas (the celebrated "Red Bus" case) and it occurred to me that I was describing things that seemed quite normal to me because I have lived with them for my entire professional life while they seemed astonishing and arbitrary to Robert because they didn't accord with what he felt was common sense and what he knew to be the way people do things in real life.Robert was… [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 5:56 am
’)” Moseley v. [read post]
28 May 2018, 9:30 pm
This Article contributes to this debate by providing a new account of the social and political consequences of Prigg v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 5:21 am
We grant AT&T’s petition for review, vacate the Board’s decision and order with respect to the “Inmate/Prisoner” shirts, and deny the Board’s cross-application for enforcement.Southern New England Telephone Company v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 5:19 am
I think the reporter did miss one very important thing, though: Randy’s representation of Angel Raich in Gonazlez v. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 10:33 am
Supreme Court's opinion in Williams v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 12:40 pm
But if I'm in a new boat with a virtually new motor, I expect it will work. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 9:21 pm
In Unruh v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 2:02 pm
In People v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 8:13 am
Loving v. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 5:00 pm
Thus, the government employees who prepared the records were “not defendant's accuser[s]' in any but the most attenuated sense”, and the breath test documents were properly admitted in evidence over defendant's objection based on the Confrontation Clause (internal citations omitted).It should be noted that some local courts have held otherwise (People v Carreira, 27 Misc3d [Watertown City Ct 2010]; People v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 6:00 am
In the case of Maeker v. [read post]
