Search for: "STATE v. YOUNGS"
Results 8461 - 8480
of 8,903
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2008, 7:52 pm
Perdue lawsuit and HB-908.Whitaker v. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 1:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 12:53 am
02/08/2008
Appellate Ruling in State of New Jersey v. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 6:35 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2008, 5:22 pm
As Bashman notes, the Oregon court held that the trial court properly refused Philip Morris's proposed punitive damages instruction, even though it correctly stated that the jury should not punish for harm to nonparties, because it also included some language that was erroneous under Oregon state law. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 1:46 am
Far too much of our research, our brain modeling is done based on what we learned about young jocks. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 8:24 am
A good example of this dynamic at work can be seen in Judge Young’s just released ruling out of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts in Bunch v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 5:44 am
And even if young Mr. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 12:38 am
Thanks to Kansas Federal Defender, who blogged (here) on United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 7:42 am
U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals, January 31, 2008 State of NC v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 11:20 am
King Billable Hour v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 10:17 am
Therefore, I respectfully dissent.Ralph Young v. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 10:20 pm
By doing so, SOX specifically addresses conflicts that arise when one professional entity performs work for a client but also owes fiduciary duties to the investing public and company shareholders. [28] SOX intimidated KPMG into disbanding their global legal entity, KLegal, which employed mover than 3,000 lawyers in 60 countries. [29] However, PriceWaterhouseCoopers, Deloitte & Touche, and Ernst & Young have no intentions of doing the same, despite… [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 7:06 pm
(In the leading Supreme Court case, Young v. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 8:34 am
At the most, it calls for summary judgment in favor of Bluestone because commercial speech is that which "does no more than propose a commercial transaction" (Bolger v Youngs Drug Products Corp., 463 US 60, 66 [1983], according to the dissent. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 8:05 pm
Parker v. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 12:57 pm
The cost to Philip Morris of trying to slant jury instructions too far in its favor -- $79.5 million in punitive damages: As I first noted in this post from this morning, today the Supreme Court of Oregon issued its ruling, on remand from the Supreme Court of the United States, in Williams v. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 1:19 pm
The Supreme Court of Canada has previously held in Thomson v. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 10:41 pm
Simpson's criminal trial) and Opening Arguments: A Young Lawyer's First Case: United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 5:46 pm
Thirteen other research libraries in the United States listed in the OCLC Worldcat indicate that they hold copies of the Alvarez book, so I have requested a copy through my library’s interlibrary loan service. [read post]
