Search for: "State v. B. V." Results 8461 - 8480 of 41,777
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2020, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
  Section 5(5) states that the court may have regard to (a) the level of prominence that a statement is given and (b) the extent of the subsequent publication (amongst other matters) when considering whether the publication is materially different. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Corp. v New York State Dept. of Labor, 80 AD3d 924 and other court rulings, the Appellate Division observed that it is well settled that "a petitioner is not aggrieved by an administrative determination made on its default and may not seek to review such a determination. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Corp. v New York State Dept. of Labor, 80 AD3d 924 and other court rulings, the Appellate Division observed that it is well settled that "a petitioner is not aggrieved by an administrative determination made on its default and may not seek to review such a determination. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 1:00 pm by Rafael Reyneri
  In reaching this conclusion, the court provided a cogent recounting of the FCC’s progressive expansion of the scope of the ATDS definition, which the court stated was rejected in ACA International v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 5:14 am by Charles Sartain
This decision is only the second application by a state supreme court of the rule of capture to hydraulic fracturing (from Texas, Coastal Oil & Gas Corp. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 1:26 pm by Craig R. Tractenberg
District Judge Anita Brody denied a motion under 12(b) (6) for dismissal of such an antitrust claim in Fuentes v. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 1:26 pm by Craig R. Tractenberg
District Judge Anita Brody denied a motion under 12(b) (6) for dismissal of such an antitrust claim in Fuentes v. [read post]
A Maryland federal court awarded summary judgment last week to policyholder National Ink in National Ink and Stitch, LLC v. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 3:58 am by Peter Mahler
The Point 128 LLC v Choi, decided earlier this month by Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Andrea Masley, did not involve a formal withdrawal notice and demand for payment of fair value as in Jacobs. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 7:16 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The court stated, [59] The motion judge stated his view that the WSIA: “provides a complete and comprehensive code for workplace injury compensation determinations,” which clearly reflects “legislative intent”. [read post]