Search for: "State v. C. S."
Results 8461 - 8480
of 37,711
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2019, 9:02 am
§ 2105(c). [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 6:48 am
Stanley v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:30 am
PNP v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
" * Interruption means separation from employment as a police officer "by reason of such officer's leave of absence, resignation or removal, other than removal for cause" (see General Municipal Law §209-q[1][c]). [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 4:45 pm
Fox v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 12:35 pm
” R.C. 4123.01(C)(1) In 2013 the Supreme Court considered the case of Armstrong v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 8:49 am
The court applied Section 230(c)(1)’s standard 3-part test: ICS Provider: Twitter qualifies (cites to Dehen, Fields, Frenken v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 7:52 am
Facts: This case (Hunters Run Gun Club, LLC et al v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 3:31 pm
From Friday's nonprecedential decision in People v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 10:32 am
For example, in State v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 9:56 am
Arora v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 8:19 am
United States Postal Service (Supreme Court 2019) [Return Mail, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
Notably, the petitioner did not testify that she had directed any of her aides to specifically supervise the student at the time of the incident.Under these circumstances, substantial evidence supports the determination of the Justice Center that the petitioner committed category three neglect (see Matter of Williams v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 151 AD3d at 1356-1357; see also Matter of Kelly v New York State… [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 3:38 am
Co. v Dworman, 2019 NY Slip Op 04494 [1st Dept June 6, 2019], a Manhattan appeals court, after three years of litigation and multiple appeals, decided the novel question of whether an arbitrator has the power to order dissolution of a New York partnership, and if so, the extent of the arbitrator’s discretion to fashion a remedy for winding up the partnership’s affairs. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 3:19 am
Fair Isaac Corp. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 1:00 am
Paten v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 4:26 pm
Céline Castets-Renard. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 2:59 pm
Hisquierdo, 439 U.S. 572, 581, 99 S.Ct. 802, 59 L.Ed.2d 1 (1979) (quoting United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 5:43 am
Under the facts and circumstances presented, it found no abuse of discretion in Supreme Courts determination to, effectively, adjust the equitable distribution award to reflect an excessive temporary maintenance award (see Johnson v. [read post]
