Search for: "State v. Code"
Results 8461 - 8480
of 27,235
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2017, 10:29 am
Code database includes complete coverage of the United States Code back to its inception in 1925. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 6:16 am
The Illinois Administrative Code sets forth a detailed pay plan for state employees in which positions are assigned established salary ranges, and raises and bonuses are based on the established applicable range. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 4:20 am
Cox, to determine the maximum extent to which the building could be enlarged under the applicable codes and regulations. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm
In Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 2:00 am
” Illinois State Toll Highway Authority v. [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 10:13 am
Taylor, for providing the following synopsis of their prevailing opinion in Protech Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 5:35 am
Additional Resources: Grogan v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 1:00 pm
Cartagena v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 12:44 pm
Association of Irritated Residents v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 7:50 am
Certification marks have been available at a national level in some member states (e.g. the UK, Germany) for a while, but the lack of EU-wide marks has led to inconsistent certification regimes/standards, and geographical gaps in certification. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 3:50 pm
The recent opinion of Protech Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 12:43 pm
" Faulkner v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 12:43 pm
" Faulkner v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 12:59 pm
Jackson v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 12:59 pm
Jackson v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 12:53 pm
In Aviles v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
In Hefczyc v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 1:04 pm
In Yates and in United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 12:19 pm
Sometimes the task of obtaining and interpreting documents from state taxing entities is confusing, because some states do not always use the vocabulary employed by the IRS, or the Bankruptcy Code, or use it in different ways. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 10:00 am
When last we left Lawfare readers, the prosecution in the United States v. al-Nashiri military commission had begun “preadmission” of evidence despite the ongoing refusal of defense counsel to participate. [read post]
