Search for: "State v. Doctor" Results 8461 - 8480 of 9,600
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2009, 1:35 am
Spisak's cases, the federal courts' decisions to overturn the death sentences hinged on Mills v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 9:12 pm
The posts in question stated: "This doctor prescribed me an antibiotic that causes birth defects after I clearly told him I was 4 months pregnant!! [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 9:07 pm
The posts in question stated: “This doctor prescribed me an antibiotic that causes birth defects after I clearly told him I was 4 months pregnant!! [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 5:09 am by Katharine Van Tassel
It appears that the Botox suit is claiming free speech protections that are similar to those that are currently provided for dietary supplements under the questionable decision of Pearson and Shaw v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 1:49 pm
United States: The LA Times, the Chicago Sun Times, NBC Chicago, and the AP report on the news that the Court will not hear an appeal of the conviction of a doctor who allegedly shot a nurse to prevent her from testifying against him in a Medicare fraud case. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 11:34 pm
But, while the word ‘shall' is often mandatory, particularly when used in legislation, it has, depending on the context, been interpreted on occasion as directory or exhortatory only: see for example R v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Jeyeanthan [2000] 1 WLR 354. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 4:19 pm
Hospitals and doctors can game the reimbursement system. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 3:13 am
Last week, in State v. [read post]