Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 8461 - 8480
of 9,094
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Dec 2008, 3:57 pm
’ Similarly, the District Court decision in In re De Puy, 7 F. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 3:06 pm
) district court's injunction is modified by limiting it to enjoining FBI officials from enforcing the nondisclosure requirement of section 2709(c) in the absence of Government-initiated judicial review. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 7:26 am
Sampson who crowed to the press about unproven abuse and spun justifications in the media to cover for what was essentially an illegal kidnapping at gunpoint by the state based on false allegations.Texas Lawyer also published nice features on its runner-up list of "Impact Players" for 2008, which includes:Andrea Marsh of the Texas Fair Defense Project, whose first case as an attorney was Rothgery v. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 4:49 am
Supreme Court held in 1963's Gideon v. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
gain upper hand in Blu-ray DRM battle (Ars Technica) Africa South African Times report on state of African music, lack of support and protection (Afro-IP) Australia Australian Copyright Tribunal: consumer valuation of copyright: Audio-Visual Copyright Society (t/a Screenrights) v Foxtel and Re PPCA (IPKat) (IP finance) Innovation patents in Australia. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 12:05 pm
In Compulink Managements Center, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
Feb. 19, 1992) (court refused to require interview).DelawareInformal interviews are allowed in the First State, but only with prior consent or by court order. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 3:51 pm
The decision on summary judgment, the first decision of a Connecticut court to directly address the issue, adopted what has become the majority view on the issue among state courts.In the underlying lawsuit, the insured, a builder of homes, was sued in connection with the construction and sale of a home. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
Software Pty Ltd v Bing Technologies Pty Limited (No 1) (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) Australian Bureau of Statistics going CC, under attribution-only licence (Creative Commons) (Michael Geist) Canada Depreciation a possible ground in opposition proceedings: Parmalat Canada Inc v Sysco Corporation (Canadian Trademark Blog) Trademarks Office considers changes to opposition practice (International Law Office) Parody defence not available according to BC Supreme… [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 5:30 am
Holding First, the court held (and the government conceded), that the probation officer needed to obtain a warrant in order to search Kone's home. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 5:04 am
In light of the Supreme Court's rulings in Gall and Kimbrough, which had come down in the interim, the majority held in United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 9:31 pm
The Witt decision was the first by a federal appeals court to find that Lawrence v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 8:17 am
However, the case cited by defendant does not represent a change in the decisional law as it was decided prior to the appellate decision in this case and relied upon other decisions of both the Appellate Division and the Appellate Term of the 9th and 10th Judicial Districts standing for the same proposition (see, People v Lewis, 16 3d 173 [1 Dept. 2005]; Patil v Country-Wide Ins. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 2:48 am
A three day hearing in the Court of session where we spent the first day roundl [read post]
7 Dec 2008, 10:30 am
[JURIST] The Montana First Judicial District [Montana courts materials] ruled Friday that terminally ill patients in the state have the right to commit physician-assisted suicide. [read post]
7 Dec 2008, 9:35 am
The UFO Chuting case, where a federal district court struck down the State of Hawaii's limitations on navigation in public waters off Maui designed to protect humpback whales, because the state had no authority to interfere with federally protected navigation. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
The issue before the Supreme Court is a state court's interpretation of the constitutional standard on punitive damages that was established by the high court. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 4:10 pm
The Supreme Judicial Court will hear oral argument on January 8, 2009 on allocation issues certified to it from the First Circuit in Century Indemnity's appeal from this pollution clean up case, Boston Gas v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:18 pm
Goforth, No. 084291 Denial of motion to review a detention order pending sentencing for violations of the Controlled Substances Act is vacated and remanded where: 1) there was no basis for concluding that Congress intended to alter the plain and unambiguous statutory definition of "judicial officer"; 2) the district judges were "judicial officers" within the language of section 3145(c) and 3156(a)(1); and 3) as a "judicial officer",… [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
Instead, this Court is required to exercise its independent power of judicial review. [read post]
