Search for: "The State Bar Court of the State Bar of California"
Results 8461 - 8480
of 11,377
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2011, 4:41 pm
As we’ve noted, rule 8.548 of the California Rules of Court allows the United States Supreme Court, a United States Court of Appeals, or a state, territory, or commonwealth court of last resort to ask the California Supreme Court to answer California legal questions, and the California high court more often than not agrees to answer the questions. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 2:02 pm
Walker, did not violate any court rules and did not violate the Supreme Court order barring TV broadcast of the trial as it occurred, outside the federal courthouse in San Francisco. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 8:51 am
Magee, the court stated that a person who flees from police and takes refuge in a home that is not his - but is instead one he goes to periodically for social visits - cannot claim a right to privacy that would bar the police from entering as part of an investigation. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
California has a number of consumer protection statutes. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:08 am
The first principle would be federal deference to state courts and state contract law. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
Drunk teen driver's near miss with busEdinburgh Evening NewsA TEENAGE girl sped the wrong way round a roundabout, narrowly missing a bus full of passengers while drink-driving, a court heard. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 1:16 am
United States, 626 F.3d 1241 (Fed. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 3:50 pm
Former Governor Schwarznegger's State Labor Commissioner Angela Bradstreet had raised some eyebrows among the plaintiffs' bar by backing the employer side in Brinker Restaurant v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 2:59 pm
The case involves a California rule that bars a state inmate from prevailing on his or her petition for habeas corpus relief in state court if the inmate "substantially delayed" in filing the petition. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 11:24 am
Such a rule would allow the state "to put an expiration date on the Takings Clause. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 1:37 am
Williams-Sonoma Stores, Inc., found that the practice of collecting ZIP codes violates a California statute, the Song-Beverly Credit Card Act, which forbids businesses from requesting “personal identification information” during a credit card transaction.The February 2011 decision has launched a flurry of class-action litigation within the California court system as plaintiff’s law firms target large retailers and other businesses that do a large volume… [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 11:34 pm
United States District Court Judge M. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 5:05 pm
Section 1708.8 excludes photos taken outside of the state of California. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 1:03 pm
In addition to the twenty-five years that Angela spent working for Carroll, Burdick and McDonough culminating in her position as firm-wide managing partner, her subsequent service as state labor commissioner, and her recent appointment as a newly-appointed San Francisco County Superior Court Judge, Angela Bradstreet has dedicated her time to advocating for women’s rights and the GLBT community, shattering glass ceilings, and serving as president of various legal organizations… [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 11:37 am
If this law applies retroactively, it’s got an uphill court battle ahead of it, to say the least. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 5:39 pm
The court stated it "feels that the anger is coming from the tension between the two parties. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 3:10 pm
Supreme Court declined to review an appellate court decision granting F.B.T. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 10:17 am
Hyatt took the case to the Supreme Court and eventually won a $388 million judgment against the state of California for invasion of privacy. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 10:05 am
California, 342 U.S. 165 (1952); Jacobson v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 9:31 am
When a courageous California lawyer, Scott Drexel, was appointed as Chief Disciplinary Counsel to the California State Bar, he tried to change the system. [read post]
